Abstract

Two purported “answers” to the proems some people are now experiencing in the dissemination of engineering information are distinguished. These are called “synoptic declension” and “electronic expansion.” Detailed versions proposed under these headings are examined and compared with the proven advantages of the engineering transactions. It is concluded that there is no viable alternative in the English-speaking world to the engineering transactions. However, certain areas where the transactions could be improved are pointed out. Reference is made to the present plight of the engineering journal, by which is meant the journal that passes across the engineer's desk and is read, not the periodical that goes straight on to the shelves for reference. It is conducted that Industry must recognize its overall interest in the future of the engineering journal and take steps to ensure its continued viability.