Abstract

This study examined whether the linguistic distance between the first (L1) and second (L2) language is a significant determinant of L2 writing skills of 292 adult immigrants from 39 different source countries, who were beginner learners of Spanish L2. Gender, age, length of residence in Spain, education level as a proxy for literacy skills in L1, enrolment in Spanish language courses, and overall communicative competence in Spanish were also considered. Using both standard procedures for assessing L2 writing and performance-based psycholinguistic measures of accuracy and text-production fluency, the findings highlight the important role of linguistic proximity in achieving greater accuracy, text-production fluency, and overall L2 writing scores. Other significant predictors were age, enrolment in Spanish courses, and education level for accuracy; and length of residence in Spain and education level for text-production fluency. Although length of residence in Spain was negatively associated with text-production fluency in L2 writing, mediation analyses revealed that the effect of age on text-production fluency was mediated by length of residence in Spain and that L2 proficiency level mediated the link between linguistic distance and text-production fluency. Furthermore, most of the errors that these immigrants made were morphosyntactic and spelling errors, while vocabulary errors were rare.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-07-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883231169511
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 57 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.17345/rile201211-30
  2. 10.1093/geronb/60.5.P223
  3. 10.2307/818661
  4. 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8
  5. 10.1353/dem.2001.0025
  6. 10.1080/14790710508668395
  7. 10.1016/S0147-9121(07)00003-9
  8. 10.1017/S027226311900007X
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x
  10. 10.21832/9781847691859-012
  11. 10.3102/00346543049002222
  12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100792
  13. 10.1007/BF00173616
  14. 10.1162/003465301753237740
  15. 10.1177/001979390205500305
  16. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
  17. 10.29140/jaltcall.v2n1.19
  18. 10.1257/jel.20191316
  19. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100790
  20. 10.1093/applin/amp048
  21. 10.1075/lllt.32.01hou
  22. 10.2139/ssrn.1919474
  23. 10.1111/roie.12041
  24. 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.027
  25. 10.1075/bpa.13.06koj
  26. 10.1075/bpa.13.05koj
  27. 10.1080/17586801.2014.943149
  28. 10.1093/applin/amp043
  29. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028
  30. 10.1007/978-3-319-69560-0
  31. 10.21832/9781847691859-004
  32. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100791
  33. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00815
  34. 10.5565/rev/doblele.40
  35. 10.58221/mosp.v110i1.7894
  36. 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100758
  37. 10.1093/applin/amp044
  38. 10.3758/BF03194960
  39. 10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_28
  40. 10.21832/9781847691859-013
  41. 10.1093/applin/amp045
  42. 10.1016/j.physa.2010.02.004
  43. 10.1111/lang.12205
  44. 10.1017/S027226311900024X
  45. 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
  46. 10.1017/S0272263100011189
  47. 10.1075/bpa.13.04sch
  48. 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00047.x
  49. 10.1093/applin/17.1.38
  50. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009
  51. 10.3758/s13423-021-01908-x
  52. 10.1017/S0272263110000021
  53. 10.1177/0265407519878787
  54. 10.1057/9780230523470_7
  55. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100794
  56. 10.1177/0267658313491266
  57. 10.1037/pne0000151
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →