Gig Expectations: Literacy Practices, Events, and Texts in the Gig Economy

Christopher Corbel University of Melbourne ; Trent Newman University of Melbourne ; Lesley Farrell University of Melbourne

Abstract

This article explores the writing and reading requirements of the literacy practices, events, and texts characteristic of work mediated by the online labor platforms of the gig economy, such as Airtasker and Freelancer, which bring together people needing a job done with those willing to do it. These emerging platform-based discourse communities and their associated literacies are a new domain of social activity. Based on an examination of seven gig economy platforms, the present article examines the core literacy event in the gig economy, the posting and bidding for tasks, together with the texts that enhance and support this process. While some tasks require written texts as the outcome or product, all tasks involve the creation of some form of written text as part of doing the work. These texts are both interactional and interpersonal. As well as being a part of negotiating and then getting a task done, they relate to the complexities of building the identities, knowledge, and relationships required of those working in a virtual work space rather than a traditional workplace. While most of these texts reflect familiar text types, the core text cycle is argued to be an “emergent” genre. Implications for education are presented.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883211052941
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. Askehave I., Nielsen A. E. (2005). Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Techn…
  2. Avis J. (2018). Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocati…
  3. 10.1057/9780230245693
  4. Black S., Yasukawa K. (2011). A tale of two councils: Alternative discourses on the “literacy crisis” in Aust…
  5. 10.1017/CBO9781316106372
  6. Education for employability
  7. Collin R. (2011). Selling the self: Career portfolios and the new common-sense of immaterial capitalism. Soci…
  8. Dean M., Spoehr J. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and the future of manufacturing work in Australia…
  9. Ducheneaut N., Bellotti V. O. (2001). E-mail as habitat: An exploration of embedded personal information mana…
  10. Farrell L. (2000). Ways of doing, ways of being: Language, education and “working” identities. Language and E…
  11. Farrell L. (2001). The “new word order”: Workplace education and the textual practice of economic globalizati…
  12. 10.1057/9780230245693_10
  13. 10.4324/9780203962664
  14. Farrell L., Newman T., Corbel C. (2020). Literacy and the workplace revolution: A social view of literate wor…
  15. Fehring H. (2020). There is more to education than the demands of the Industrial Revolution 4.0: A focus on l…
  16. Garcia A. C., Standlee A. I., Bechkoff J., Cui Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and compute…
  17. Gegenhuber T., Schüßler E. (2020). Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworkers voice regimes on digi…
  18. 10.4324/9780203070895
  19. Healy J., Nicholson D., Pekarek A. (2017). Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour & Industry, 27(3)…
  20. Hillier A., Kelly R. P., Klinger T. (2016). Narrative style influences citation frequency in climate change s…
  21. Jaworski A. (2015). Globalese: A new visual-linguistic register. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 217-235. https://do…
  22. 10.4135/9781526435620.n24
  23. 10.4159/9780674969469
  24. Martin C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal cap…
  25. Martin N. M., Lambert C. (2015). Differentiating digital writing instruction: The intersection of technology,…
  26. Miller C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.…
  27. Miller C. R. (2015). Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later (2014). Letras & Letras, 31(3), …
  28. 10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_1
  29. Nica E., Potcovaru A.M., Mirica C.O. D. (2017). A question of trust: Cognitive capitalism, digital reputation…
  30. Pennycook A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 2…
  31. Richardson L. (2015). Performing the shared economy. Geoforum, 67(December), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016…
  32. Sindhwani P., Ahuja V. (2014). A study of online co-creation strategies of Starbucks using netnography. Inter…
  33. Srnicek N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Ju…
  34. 10.5040/9780755637089
  35. Sutherland W., Jarrahi M. H., Dunn M., Nelson S. B. (2020). Work precarity and gig literacies in online freel…
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →