Processing Time and Cognitive Effort of Longhand Note Taking When Reading and Summarizing a Structured or Linear Text

Written Communication Apr 2017 Open Access

Processing Time and Cognitive Effort of Longhand Note Taking When Reading and Summarizing a Structured or Linear Text

Thierry Olive Université de Poitiers ; Marie-Laure Barbier Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive

Abstract

We examined longhand note taking strategies when reading and summarizing a source text that was formatted with bullets or that was presented in a single paragraph. We analyzed cognitive effort when reading the source text, when jotting notes, when reading the notes, and when composing the summary, as well as time spent in these activities and the content of the notes and the summaries. With a formatted text, students’ perceived comprehension difficulty was lower and they expended less cognitive effort, spent less time reading the text, and noted more ideas. While composing the summary, only those students who read the formatted source text continued selecting ideas in their notes. Finally, the summaries were unaffected by the formatting of the source text. The study shows that formatting a source text with bullets facilitates note taking by helping students to grasp its structure and by reducing the cognitive effort of reading.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2017-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088317699898
Open Access: OA PDF Green
Topics: multilingual writers affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Hesse (2019)

Journals in Composition Studies, Thirty-Five Years After

College English

Cites in this index (3)

Olive et al. (2012)

The Visuospatial Dimension of Writing

Written Communication
HAAS (1990)

Composing in Technological Contexts

Written Communication
Haas et al. (1986)

What Did I Just Say? Reading Problems in Writing with the Machine

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓

10.1207/s15328023top1201_9

↗
Barbier M. L., Piolat A., Roussey J. Y., Olive T. (2006). Note-taking in second language: Language procedures…

↗
10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034419

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.267

↗
10.1177/00222194020350040201

↗
10.1177/00222194070400030301

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.103

↗
10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122

↗
10.1080/00220970009598498

↗
Kellogg R. T. (2013)

10.17239/jowr-2013.05.02.1

Journal of Writing Research ↗
10.1177/00222194040370020201

↗
10.3102/00028312029002303

↗
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001

↗
10.1080/01443410500342070

↗
10.1080/01638539809545028

↗
10.4074/S0003503310002071

↗
10.1080/00461520701756321

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.537

↗
10.1007/BF01463939

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141

↗
10.1177/0956797614524581

↗
10.1007/BF00136532

↗
10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32

↗
10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4

↗
10.1007/978-94-010-0468-8_3

↗
10.1002/acp.2881

↗
10.3758/BF03207701

↗
10.1080/00220979809598342

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.455

↗
10.1080/03634520109379256

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 21 View in citation network →