Abstract

This study examines how Japanese students perceive the qualities of written arguments that were constructed to have different forms. Based on the theoretical dimensions of verbal communication styles that Gudykunst and Ting-Toomey (1988) proposed, the research questions asked whether the respondents would perceive direct arguments to be of higher quality than indirect arguments. They also asked whether they would perceive elaborate arguments to be of higher quality than succinct arguments. Japanese college students voluntarily responded to a questionnaire. The results revealed that they gave higher ratings to direct arguments than to indirect arguments for both of the two indicators, and higher ratings to elaborate arguments than to succinct arguments for two indicators out of the three. The results were discussed and implications were offered.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2011-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088311420798
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication
Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00002-0
  2. 10.1016/0147-1767(77)90019-0
  3. 10.1080/23808985.1983.11678555
  4. 10.1080/03637758409390181
  5. 10.1080/01463378609369639
  6. 10.1093/sf/54.2.452
  7. 10.1515/text.1.1986.6.2.171
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00786.x
  9. 10.1080/01463379109369791
  10. 10.1177/0093650208321784
  11. 10.1086/209146
  12. 10.1515/9780824845025
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.429
  14. 10.1080/07491409.2006.10162498
  15. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.02.005
  16. 10.1080/01463373.2011.541365
  17. 10.1080/03637759409376336
  18. 10.1023/A:1007832910904
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →