Written Communication Oct 2011 Open Access

Perceptions of the Qualities of Written Arguments by Japanese Students

Shinobu Suzuki Hokkaido University

Abstract

This study examines how Japanese students perceive the qualities of written arguments that were constructed to have different forms. Based on the theoretical dimensions of verbal communication styles that Gudykunst and Ting-Toomey (1988) proposed, the research questions asked whether the respondents would perceive direct arguments to be of higher quality than indirect arguments. They also asked whether they would perceive elaborate arguments to be of higher quality than succinct arguments. Japanese college students voluntarily responded to a questionnaire. The results revealed that they gave higher ratings to direct arguments than to indirect arguments for both of the two indicators, and higher ratings to elaborate arguments than to succinct arguments for two indicators out of the three. The results were discussed and implications were offered.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2011-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088311420798
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (36) · 2 in this index

  1. Barnlund D. (1975)
    Public and private self in Japan and the United States
  2. Becker C. B. (1988)
    Intercultural communication: A reader
  3. 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00002-0
     ↗
  4. Campbell K. K. (2003)
    The rhetorical act
  5. Clancy P. (1986)
    Language and socialization across cultures
Show all 36 →
  1. 10.1016/0147-1767(77)90019-0
     ↗
  2. 10.1080/23808985.1983.11678555
     ↗
  3. 10.1080/03637758409390181
     ↗
  4. Gudykunst W. (1988)
    Culture and interpersonal communication
  5. Hall E. T. (1976)
    Beyond culture
  6. 10.1080/01463378609369639
     ↗
  7. Hofstede G. (1980)
    Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values
  8. 10.1093/sf/54.2.452
     ↗
  9. 10.1515/text.1.1986.6.2.171
     ↗
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00786.x
     ↗
  11. Kim Y. Y. (1994)
    Communicating in multinational organizations
  12. 10.1080/01463379109369791
     ↗
  13. Kuhn D. (1998)
    The development of scientific thinking skills
  14. Lasswell H. D. (1948)
    The communication of ideas
  15. 10.1177/0093650208321784
     ↗
  16. Mizutani E. (1981)
    Japanese: The spoken language in Japanese life
  17. 10.1086/209146
     ↗
  18. 10.1515/9780824845025
     ↗
  19. Okabe R. (1983)
    Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives
  20. Prunty A. M. (1990)
    Psychological Reports
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.429
     ↗
  22. Reinard J. C. (1991)
    Foundations of argument: Effective communication for critical thinking
  23. Scott R. L. (1969)
    The speaker’s reader: Concepts in speech-communication
  24. Suzuki S.
    Paper presented at the annual convention of Communication Association of Japan
  25. 10.1080/07491409.2006.10162498
     ↗
  26. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.02.005
     ↗
  27. 10.1080/01463373.2011.541365
     ↗
  28. 10.1080/03637759409376336
     ↗
  29. Warnick et al. (2000)
    The Organization of Justificatory Discourse in Interaction: A Comparison Within…
    Argumentation
  30. Wolfe et al. (2009)
    Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation
    Written Communication
  31. Zarefsky D. (1990)
    Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →