Abstract

Commentary: My intent in doing this project was to illustrate that an archaeological site as (apparently) obscure as the Amphiareion of Oropos holds a wealth of evidence about the nature and practice of rhetorical contests. Indirectly, I also hoped to illustrate that developing new methods of analysis through “field work” in classical rhetoric complements conventional arm-chair research - characteristic of literary analysis - as a source of primary evidence. The study opportunities and support that I received in 1974 and 1977 from the American School of Classical Studies at Athens and the Greek Ministry of Science and Culture convinced me that the Amphiareion would be appropriate for study. The Amphiareion was small enough for an in-depth examination and large enough to be known by ancient geographers such as Pausanias. From 1977 to 1985 I analyzed the information I had gathered about the site: the inscriptions my wife, Jane Helppie, and I had photographed and drawn on our field trips, the commentary of ancient sources, and the results of archaeological excavations under Basil Petracos and the Greek Archaeological Service. This study reveals that rhetoric was practiced at locations other than prominent centers such as Athens and that these practices were sustained for centuries. In the future I plan to visit other larger and better known sites in order to continue the search for information that provides the basis for a richer understanding of the history of written communication in Greece.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1998-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088398015003005
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Septem contra Thebas
  2. 10.1080/01463377709369250
  3. 10.1080/10570317809373932
  4. 10.1086/366210
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →