Abstract

Texts reflect the conditions under which they are produced. This means that the writing process can favor or counteract a comprehensible text. In this article, problems of law text comprehensibility are related to the legislative writing process. The drafting of three pieces of Swedish consumer legislation was observed at different stages, and the results of this study are summarized and analyzed in relation to rhetorical and sociolinguistic theories of writing. Law writing can roughly be described by a rhetorical model as regards the role of the main phases in the process. It is, however, found to be less reader-oriented and more oriented toward the speech community than the rhetorical model prescribes.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1989-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088389006001006
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90132-2
  2. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
  3. 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90268-1
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →