Abstract

Presented here is a brief report of a study along with an extensive criticism of this and other studies that use contrived tasks for investigating children's humor and writing. The original study had hoped to anwer questions related to how child-produced humor might vary with the sex and age of the intended audience, how writing would figure in child-produced humor, and any relationships that might exist between production of and talk about humor. Two middle-class fourth-grade classrooms were told a contrived story and asked to produce something funny for some sick children. Children in one class produced something for two sick children, both male, one in first and one in eighth grade. The other class produced something for two sick children, both female, one in first and one in eighth grade. Productions (N = 136) were collected and analyzed. Of the fourth graders, 9 were then interviewed about their conceptions of humor and of their productions. Children's productions did vary according to the age and sex of the intended audience. There were no particular relationships between the humor of variability of the productions and the talk about humor. The major criticism in this and similar studies is that the data are flawed. Despite efforts in the opposite direction, the contrived task produced a confused pragmatic context. Once the pragmatics were distorted, the data no longer represented the phenomena of interest—humor and writing. Without extensive observations and interviews, there is little evidence that these findings represent what the chosen variables make them appear to represent. An argument is thus made for increased sensitivity to what phenomena research data actually represent.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1986-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088386003003004
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (33)

  1. Cognitive processes in writing
  2. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods
  3. Research on composing
  4. Lessons from a child
  5. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01920.x
Show all 33 →
  1. 10.58680/la198226471
    Language Arts  
  2. Development of writing in a bilingual program
  3. Writing in a bilingual program: Habia una vez
  4. 10.2307/356600
  5. 10.1017/S0305000900001781
  6. Forms of talk
  7. Writing: Teachers and children at work
  8. Ethnography and language in educational settings
  9. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation
  10. annual meeting of American Education Research Association
  11. Language Arts
  12. Children's language and learning
  13. 10.1037/h0076942
  14. 10.1017/S0305000900007534
  15. Future of education for exceptional students
  16. The reality of ethnomethodology
  17. Children's functional language and education in the early years
  18. 10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.106
  19. Harvard Educational Review
  20. Colloquium Series on Qualitative Research, Arizona State University
  21. 10.2307/1127755
  22. 10.1037/h0035549
  23. 10.1080/00221325.1976.10533994
  24. A guide to teaching the importance of audience and subject
  25. 10.1080/00405847909542843
  26. 10.1086/461174
  27. Family literacy
  28. 10.3102/0013189X012010006