Written Communication Jan 1986

Error Analysis, Theories of Language, and the Teaching of Writing

JAMES W. NEY

Abstract

Teachers of writing have currently been showing an interest in error analysis, a device that has been used informally for some time but has received serious attention from linguists and language teaching methodologists only recently. This interest in error analysis seems strange because this type of analysis possesses many of the characteristics of structuralism and few (if any) of the characteristics of tranformationalism. As a result, the objections to error analysis are partly theoretical in nature. Because the number of sentences in a language is infinite, the number of different kinds of errors that students can make is infinite or, at least, indefinitely large. Because of this, the chance of a student producing a particular sentence exhibiting a particular error is very small. This is the principal reason behind the creation of vague, general, and subsequently rather meaningless categories in the taxonomies that are used in error analysis. For this reason, it would seem to be appropriate for teachers to abandon error analysis and lead students through the use of creative language exercises into the writing of creative sentences.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1986-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088386003001002
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
teacher development grammar and mechanics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (27)

  1. 10.2307/356486
     ↗
  2. Beaugrande, R. de
    Text production: Toward a science of composition
  3. Bloomfield, L.
    Language
  4. Britton, J.
    The development of writing abilities (11-18)
  5. Chomsky, N.A.
    Syntactic structures
Show all 27 →
  1. Chomsky, N. A.
    Third Texas conference on problems of linguistic analysis in English
  2. Chomsky, N. A.
    The sound pattern of English
  3. Dijk, T. A. van
    Macrostructures
  4. Dougherty, R. C. (1974)
    International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics,”
  5. Ervin-Tripp, M.
    Language acquisition and communicative choice
  6. Freeman, D. C.
    Linguistics, stylistics, and the teaching of composition
  7. Fries, C. C.
    American English grammar
  8. Fries, C. C.
    The structure of English
  9. Graves, D. (1973). Children's writing: Research directions and hypotheses based upon an…
  10. Hanna, P. R.
    Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement
  11. Hill, A. A.
    Introduction to linguistic structures
  12. Hirsch, E. D., Jr.
    The philosophy of composition
  13. Joos, M.
    Readings in linguistics
  14. Kaplan, R. B.
    Learning to write: First language/second language
  15. Piattelli-Palmarini, M.
    Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky
  16. Rentel, V.
    Research on Writing: Principles and Methods
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x
     ↗
  18. 10.2307/3585740
     ↗
  19. Shaughnessy M. P.
    Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing
  20. Tamor, L.
    Research on writing: Principles and methods
  21. 10.1080/03626784.1981.11075238
     ↗
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00150.x
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Examining Automated Writing Evaluation Error Coverage in Relation to Uptake and Retention ↗
    Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad; Link, Stephanie
    genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development revision assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  2. Written Communication Jan 2026
    The Contributions of Student-Level and Classroom-Level Factors for Australian Grade 2 Students’ Writing Performance ↗
    Anabela Malpique; Mustafa Asil; Deborah Pino-Pasternak; Debora Valcan
    writing pedagogy teacher development revision grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing
  3. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    How reliable and valid is peer evaluation in adolescents’ L2 argumentative writing? ↗
    Albert W. Li; Steve Graham
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies
  4. Assessing Writing Oct 2025
    Judgment accuracy in primary school EFL writing assessment: Do text characteristics matter? ↗
    Ruth Trüb; Jens Möller; Julian Lohmann; Thorben Jansen; Stefan D. Keller
    teacher development assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  5. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    Syntactic Complexity of AI-Generated Argumentative and Narrative Texts: Implications for Teaching and Learning Writing ↗
    Apisak Sukying; Jessie S. Barrot
    rhetorical criticism genre theory teacher development artificial intelligence grammar and mechanics