Abstract

Historically, the commons is conceptually rooted in concerns over shared expertise derived from material resources. Contemporary understandings increasingly examine varied commons rooted in the general intellect—an affective and ideational production across people. Too often, this focus reduces technology to either a tool for, or impediment to, building and accessing robust commons, and overlooks the colonial inheritance of contemporary theory. As a corrective, we follow efforts to rehabilitate the Luddites as not antitechnology, but as technology ethicists, and theorize technology as a coproducer of the general intellect. Situating Sophie Zhang’s and others’ activism as exemplary of a productive neo-Luddism, we argue that technology constitutively remediates the general intellect and as such is central to the ethics of the commons. From this, we advance the argument that rhetorical sabotage is key to promoting a general intellect against the corporate interests and technical-colonialism too often coded into commons.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2023-05-27
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2023.2200699
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.3898/NeWF.82.01.2014
  2. 10.1515/9780271080338-012
  3. 10.18574/nyu/9781479820375.001.0001
  4. 10.1111/wusa.12217
  5. 10.1215/26410478-9355193
  6. 10.4324/9780367822033-5
  7. 10.1093/past/1.1.57
  8. 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1954229
  9. 10.1007/s10699-015-9468-1
  10. 10.7551/mitpress/12551.001.0001
  11. 10.1080/10304310600641760
  12. 10.1080/10455750500505473
  13. 10.18574/nyu/9781479808373.001.0001
  14. 10.1002/9781119558071.ch48
  15. 10.1163/156920607X225843
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →