Abstract

Scholars in disability studies have recently sought to account for fatness, claiming an inseparable link between disability and fat scholarship. Interrogating the stigmas of fatness as a sign of bad character or lack of discipline, rhetoricians have advanced this thinking, illustrating how to be fat is to be rhetorically disabled. Contributing to these efforts, this essay argues that eating disorders, too, are often framed through deficit thinking, positioned as antithetical to mental fitness—a disparaging view echoed prominently by Hilde Bruch. Challenging normative perspectives of rhetoric centered in her theories, I analyze Bruch’s The Golden Cage, tracing descriptions of anorexia and pain through a feminist materialist lens, ultimately revealing how the rhetoricity of fat stigma can be read not only as a product of cultural, patriarchal norms but also as a complex, lived, felt experience of mental disability, expanding theories of rhetoric to the material intersection of gender and embodiment.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2021-10-20
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2021.1972131
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  2. 10.1080/14680770600802066
  3. 10.2307/j.ctt5vkff8.11
  4. 10.1215/9780822373520
  5. Hetrick, Ashley and Derek Attig. “Sitting Pretty: Fat Bodies, Classroom Desks, and Academic Excess.”The Fat S…
  6. 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207347
  7. 10.1177/1367877914561831
  8. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821634
  9. 10.18061/dsq.v26i1.648
  10. 10.1080/00335630.2018.1447141
  11. 10.4324/9780203876442
  12. 10.5744/rhm.2019.1003
  13. 10.1111/hypa.12126
  14. 10.1093/melus/31.3.67
  15. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00754.x
  16. 10.3828/jlcds.2014.16
  17. 10.1111/hypa.12127
  18. 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
  19. 10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3705
  20. 10.1080/10462930701754382
  21. 10.1080/21662630.2013.798560
  22. 10.18061/dsq.v22i3.356
  23. 10.1002/erv.2511
  24. 10.2307/j.ctv6wgmmq
  25. 10.1215/9780822372189
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →