Abstract

Marching in public, as members of a public meant to be seen in public, has been one of the most frequently deployed forms of collective social protest in the United States. For people with disabilities, however, this type of rhetorical action is fraught with normative assumptions that go beyond presumed needs for accommodation, access, and alternative modes of participation. This essay identifies the far less visible constraints created by previous historic and rhetorical practices, including some of the discourse of other progressive social activists. Both the prospect and the practice of marching as a rhetorical form of performative public argument are thus complex for people with disabilities who are too often not seen as equal citizens. The trouble with marching is thus ableism and its sustained invisibility.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2020-05-26
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2020.1752127
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/1464700107078139
  2. 10.1023/A:1025179019397
  3. 10.1080/07393180128077
  4. 10.1080/15295039309366878
  5. 10.1215/9780822390169-018
  6. 10.1353/rap.2007.0023
  7. 10.1080/10646175.2017.1287609
  8. 10.1080/10570314.2018.1446548
  9. 10.1080/00335630.2017.1321134
  10. 10.1080/00377996.2014.988866
  11. 10.18574/nyu/9780814740880.001.0001
  12. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816693979.001.0001
  13. 10.1353/rap.2013.0023
  14. 10.1080/00918369.2017.1391015
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →