Abstract

I continue to negate the negation/negativity of the so-called science of philology. Following Werner Hamicher’s recent publication of “95 Theses on Philology,” I agree that philology is not a science in any sense of modernity’s object of study. I challenge the presumed law of chronological time (origins, cause/effect, periodization). I re-begin with a remembrance of the struggle between Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff and Friedrich Nietzsche. I continue with help from Vilém Flusser and Jean-Luc Godard. For the future anterior, I have given myself an assignment—virtually, an assignation, of re-making this article into a book (chapters with excurses, shooting scripts, and storyboards) and, yes, re-making it into a film.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2014-05-27
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2014.911564
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Time that Remains
  2. 10.1080/00335630600687156
  3. 10.1086/661977
  4. 10.1215/10642684-2006-030
  5. 10.1215/9780822393184
  6. 10.1353/sub.2004.0006
  7. 10.1353/dia.2009.0004
  8. Displacement: Derrida and After
  9. An Erotic Philology of Golden Age Spain
  10. Out of Time: Desire in Atemporal Cinema
  11. Film Fables. Trans. Emiliano Battista
  12. 10.7228/manchester/9780719082443.001.0001
  13. 10.1002/9780470690864.ch7
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →