Abstract

This essay analyzes and contrasts the rhetorical appeals of Breast Cancer Action and Breast Cancer Fund, the two national breast cancer organizations devoted to prevention and environmental activism. Following in the tradition of rhetoric scholars who understand rhetoric as constitutive of its audiences, I elucidate not only how these organizations recruit new audiences to their cause, but who they construct as recruitable. Ultimately, I demonstrate that one of these organizations' rhetorics is successful as constitutive rhetoric (the other's less so), but worry over the political and social actions potentially precluded by its successes. This organization's rhetoric, as I show, retains and thus recirculates many individualistic assumptions and regressive notions of femininity associated with the more mainstream breast cancer movement and, well beyond, with most hegemonic US discourses.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2013-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2013.768350
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Communication Design Quarterly
  4. Communication Design Quarterly

References (59) · 1 in this index

  1. “Act for Change.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. 22 June 2012.
  2. World at Risk
  3. “Big Picture Solutions.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. 21 June 2012.
  4. BCAction. Breast Cancer Action, n.d. 22 June 2012.
  5. Breast Cancer Action.BCA Policy on Breast Cancer Screening and “Early Detection.”Breast Cancer Action, 2010.B…
Show all 59 →
  1. Think Before You Pink®: A Toolkit for Breast Cancer Activists
  2. “Breast Cancer and Environment.”BCAction. Breast Cancer Action, n.d. Web. 1 June 2012.
  3. Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. 3 June 2012.
  4. “Cancer Policy Perspective.”BCAction. Breast Cancer Action, n.d. Web. 19 June 2012.
  5. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric
  6. 10.1080/00335638709383799
  7. “Choose Safe Cosmetics.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  8. The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity
  9. Body Talk: Rhetoric, Technology, Reproduction
  10. “Create a Healthy Home.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  11. DyBuncio, Monica. “Pink Fatigue? Breast Cancer Campaign Gets Slammed.”CBSNews. CBS News, 12 October 2011. Web…
  12. “Eat and Live Better.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  13. Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America
  14. Harper's Magazine
  15. Disability Studies Quarterly
  16. Hypatia
  17. Holmes, Anna. “Detailing the Problems of ‘Breast Cancer Culture.’”Washington Post. The Washington Post, 9 Feb…
  18. “Innovative Research.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 8 June 2012.
  19. Jaggar, Karuna. “Put the Power of Change in Your Hands.” Message to BCA membership. 21 June 2012. E-mail.
  20. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.036
  21. Pink Ribbons, Inc. Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy
  22. The Biopolitics of Breast Cancer: Changing Cultures of Disease and Activism
  23. From Pink to Green: Disease Prevention and the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement
  24. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  25. “Make Our Products Safe.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 21 June 2012.
  26. “Make Prevention a Public Health Priority.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 21 June 2012.
  27. “Most Recent Mammography Recommendations Confuse Public, Report Finds.”ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily®, 6 April 2…
  28. Orenstein, Peggy. “Moving Beyond Pink Ribbons.”LATimes. Los Angeles Times, 15 February 2012. Web. 9 May 2012.
  29. 10.1080/0033563032000160981
  30. Toxic Tourism: Rhetorics of Pollution, Travel, and Environmental Justice
  31. “Pink Fatigue? Breast Cancer Campaign Under Fire.”FoxNews. Fox News, 13 October 2011. Web. 9 May 2012.
  32. 10.1191/0967550706ab039oa
    Auto/Biography  
  33. The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  34. “Prevention is Power.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  35. “Protect Your Family.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  36. “Protect Yourself and the Environment.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  37. “Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomics.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 21 June 2012.
  38. “Reduce your Risk.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 16 June 2012.
  39. Roan, Shari, and Eryn Brown. “Komen Executive Quits and Questions Persist.”LATimes. Los Angeles Times, 7 Febr…
  40. 10.1080/00335630600816938
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  41. 10.1558/lhs.v3i1.3
    Linguistics and the Human Sciences  
  42. In These Times
  43. Pink Ribbon Blues: How Breast Cancer Culture Undermines Women's Health
  44. Szabo, Liz. “Breast Cancer Activist Brenner Struggles to Preserve Voice.”USATODAY. Gannet, 18 July 2011. Web.…
  45. 10.1080/07491409.2005.10162482
  46. “Timing of Exposure.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 5 June 2012.
  47. “Tips for Prevention.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 15 June 2012.
  48. “Vulnerable Populations.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 21 June 2012.
  49. Wallis, David. “Komen Foundation Struggles to Regain Wide Support.”The New York Times. The New York Times Com…
  50. “What Does BCAction Do?”BCAction. Breast Cancer Action, n.d. Web. 19 June 2012.
  51. “Which Chemicals are Linked to Breast Cancer?”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 5 June 2012.
  52. “Workers.”Breast Cancer Fund. Breast Cancer Fund, n.d. Web. 21 June 2012.
  53. 10.2307/3178391
  54. 10.1080/10570310701653786
    Western Journal of Communication