Abstract

In the 1870s and ‘80s, more women discussed sex to promote free love and sex education in speeches, pamphlets, books, and periodicals. Some of these women inspired the 1873 “Comstock law,” which banned materials deemed obscene. This essay uses the fictional figure of Audacia Dangyereyes to illustrate the constraints on women discussing sex in public forums. It identifies the rhetorical moves necessary to accommodate constraining audiences through close readings of the works of Victoria Woodhull, Tennessee Claflin, and Angela Heywood, all women deemed immodest by public standards and obscene by Anthony Comstock. To allay such charges, these women worked to redefine appropriate speech for women.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2012.724515
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/152263790600800301
  2. 10.1353/jowh.2000.0022
  3. 10.2307/2568758
  4. 10.1353/jowh.2000.0042
  5. Available Means: An Anthology of Women's Rhetoric(s)
  6. The Sex Radicals: Free Love in High Victorian America
  7. The Woman Who Ran for President: The Many Lives of Victoria Woodhull
  8. The Beecher Sisters
  9. 10.1353/amp.2008.0009
  10. 10.1080/00335639509384108
  11. 10.1080/00335630209384368
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →