Abstract

This paper argues that, for many people and in many circumstances, public deliberation is about group identity rather than argumentation. Research on ingroup and outgroup thinking in social psychology helps to explain why thinking in terms of group identity is so powerful. The power comes from the promise that the world is a stable and easily known place, made up of discrete and transparent groups.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2009-04-13
DOI
10.1080/02773940902766763
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College English
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.005
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
  3. 10.1002/9780470773963.ch24
  4. 10.4135/9781483327648.n2
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.009
  6. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01054.x
    British Journal of Social Psychology  
  7. 10.1002/9780470773963.ch13
  8. Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs About Social Groups
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.53
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.585
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  12. 10.1017/CBO9780511614712
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.004
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →