Adam Smith's Moral Economy and the Debate to Abolish the Slave Trade

Srividhya Swaminathan Long Island University

Abstract

Adam Smith's contribution to antislavery rhetoric has been well-documented by scholars. However, few have thought to examine his impact on the writing of slavery advocates. In the late eighteenth-century debate to abolish the slave trade in Great Britain, abolitionists appropriated Smith's rhetoric to create a “moral economy” that could not tolerate the practice of slaving. Proslavery writers, perceiving the sincere threat to their livelihood, also manipulated Smith's rhetoric and the concept of “moral economy” to formulate arguments in defense of the slave trade. This article complements and expands analyses of Smith's rhetorical and economic theories as well as the rhetoric of the first abolitionist campaign in order to open avenues of inquiry that examine both sides of the debate.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2007-10-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940601148305
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/2953314
  2. 10.1057/9780230501621
  3. The Mighty Experiment
  4. 10.2307/463754
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511582790
  6. The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces
  7. 10.1080/01440390308559167
    Slavery and Abolition  
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →