Abstract

Bakhtin’s work from the late 1920s and 1930s on the novel has been the principal source for critical discussion of his views of rhetoric and poetics—a discussion in which both arts are deprecated—but his early phenomenological work on architectonics and Voloshinov’s early sociological work provide alternative sources that offer fresh terms for rethinking these discursive practices. The phenomenological works permit us to reconceptualize rhetoric as the primary discourse of active evaluative being-in-the-world and poetry as an imitation of that discourse that makes it available for aesthetic contemplation. The sociological work preserves the relation of speaker/agent to the other that the phenomenological work emphasizes and adds to it a relation of speaker to listener. The translation of the phenomenological terms to a sociological register brings the theory closer to life and history. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2006-12-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940600867921
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (18) · 2 in this index

  1. Art and Answerability
  2. Art and Answerability
  3. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
  4. The Dialogic Imagination
  5. Toward a Philosophy of the Act
Show all 18 →
  1. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
  2. A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. 10.1215/03335372-21-2-379
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Critique of Pure Reason
  7. Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges
  8. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics
  9. The Hermeneutics of Original Argument: Demonstration, Dialectic, Rhetoric
  10. 10.2307/2504890
  11. Freudianism: A Critical Sketch
  12. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language
  13. Bakhtin and the Social Moorings of Poetry