Abstract

Abstract This article takes the form of a dialogue between traditional rhetoric and cognitive rhetoric, offering complementary readings of rhetoric and figuration in President George W. Bush's 2002 State of the Union Address, the so‐called “axis of evil” speech. Traditional and cognitive rhetorics differ most markedly in their approach to metaphor, metonymy, and other figures. This dialogue brings important differences into focus and, at the same time, demonstrates the potential of combining approaches. In addition to metonymy and metaphor, it discusses blending theory, acutezze, and related questions.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2004-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940409391281
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14) · 1 in this index

  1. How to Do Things with Words
  2. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads
  3. A Grammar of Motives
  4. 2003. “David Frum Discusses his New Book ‘The Right Man’ and his Experience Working as a Speechwriter for Pre…
  5. A War of Words in the Discourse of Trade: The Rhetorical Constitution of Metaphor
Show all 14 →
  1. 2003. “Famous Phrase from President Bush's Last State of the Union Address Still Generating Controversy One Y…
  2. The Sixties Project
  3. Metaphors We Live By
  4. Written Communication
  5. Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism
  6. 29 January 2002. “The President's State of the Union Address.”. 29 January, Washington, D.C.: The White House…
  7. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities
  8. Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science
  9. The Art of Rhetoric
    Value Inquiry Book Series