Satirizing women's speech in eighteenth‐century England

Stephen H. Browne

doi:10.1080/02773949209390957

Rhetoric Society Quarterly Jun 1992

Satirizing women's speech in eighteenth‐century England

Stephen H. Browne Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

In the summer of 1763, James Boswell witnessed Quaker woman speaking to her Sunday gathering. Shortly thereafter, Boswell remarked on the event to Samuel Johnson. Sir, Dr. Johnson replied, a woman's preaching is like dog's walking on its hinder legs. It is not done well, but you are surprised to find it done at all.' Johnson's comment expresses two significant features of early modem rhetorical practice: women's public address was rare, and it was widely considered an affront to conventions of cultural discourse. Neither comes as surprise for those familiar with eighteenth-century public life; but they do serve as prompts to the question: How and to what effect was women's speech portrayed in this period? In searching for answers, we are led back toward the modem origins of rhetoric's historical association with misogyny. I examine in this essay popular representations of women as speakers in the eighteenth-century. Surveying prominent journals, reviews, newspapers, and magazines, we can better understand how rhetorical conventions help to condition audiences and habituate responses. One such rhetorical convention-misogynist satire-is here examined as force in shaping attitudes toward women as speakers. My interest is not so much in the formal properties of satire-though we must reckon with rhetorical form-but more in convention and content as modes of insinuation. satiric portrayal of women by men in eighteenth-century England may be grouped for synoptic purposes according to two general characterizations: (1) Womens's speech is perverse, and (2) it is meaningless. Subsidiary associations interlard this body of satiric literature, including images of violence, victimage, and absurdity. Together, these satiric representations help to establish patterns of reception, habits of perceiving women's speech as naturally aberrant. Insofar as such images of women's speech were promoted in popular and pejorative terms, we may accord to the eighteenth-century male satirists significant role in shaping modern attitudes about women and speech. My analysis thus enters into the arc of rhetorical action where production and praxis meet-that is, at the point where misogynist convention and audience inclination touch. I hope to thereby establish the destructive force of such satire, and to show that it functioned to withhold from women incentives to public address. This study, then, takes as its point of departure Felicity Nussbaum's observation on eighteenth-century discursive practices. The context of antifeminist satires, she writes, creates myth of assumptions that resonate in the satirists's minds. Women, as the violator of the authority of her contractural bonds to the patriarchical order, dares to disdain that authority in the Restoration

Journal: Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published: 1992-06-01
DOI: 10.1080/02773949209390957
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism discourse analysis gender and writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (30)

Boswell, James. 1983.Life of Johnson, 327New York: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, Felicity. 1984.The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women 1660–1750, 3Lexington: University…
Harrison, Stanley. 1974.Poor Men's Guardians: A Record of the Struggles for a Democratic Newspaper Press. 176…
Bond, Richard. 1969.Growth and Change in the Early English Press, 4Lawrence: University of Kansas Libraries.
Black Jeremy (1987)

The English Press in the Eighteenth Century

Show all 30 →

Cranfield, Geoffrey A. 1978.The Press and Society: From Caxton to Northcliffe, 31–57. London: Longman.
10.1017/CBO9780511552908

↗
Luria Gina (1974)

Letters on Education
Nussbaum.The Brink of All We Hate8–42.
Caretta Vincent (1983)

The Snarling Muse: Verbal and Visual Satire From Pope to Churchill
Adburgham, Allison. 1972.Women in Print: Writing Women and Women's Magazines From the Restoration to the Acce…
White Cynthia (1970)

Women's Magazines, 1693–1968
Gravlee, G. Jack and Irvine, James R., eds. 1979.The Whore's Rhetoric, 36New York: Scholar's Facsimiles and R…
(1711)

Spectator
(1709)

British Apollo
Belsey Catherine (1988)

John Milton: Language, Gender, Power
Jardine Lisa (1983)

Still Harping on Daughters: Women and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare
Plain (1756)

i>Dealer
(1773)

Oxford Magazine
Nussbaum. 1976.Satires On Women, Augustan Reprint no. 150 iiLos Angeles: William Clark Memorial Library.
1783.European Magazine and London Review272
1708.British Apollo, n.p.
(1712)

Spectator
(1713)

Guardian
(1754)

World
(1754)

World
(1734)

London Magazine
1737.Weekly Miscellany, n.p.
(1711)

Spectator
(1756)

Prater

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Satirizing women's speech in eighteenth‐century England

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (30)

Related Articles