Rhetoric Society Quarterly Mar 1990

Some less‐acknowledged links: Rhetorical theory, interpersonal communication, and the tradition of the liberal arts

Glen McClish Southwestern University

Abstract

In last twenty-five years, field interpersonal communication has expanded tenaciously, establishing connections with disciplines such as sociology, psychology, and even literary studies.l Although this rapid expansion indicates current strength and vigor field, it also indicative a veritable identity crisis. Suggests Arthur P. Bochner, Interpersonal communication is a vague, fragmented, and loosely-defined subject that intersects all behavioral, social, and cultural sciences. There are no rigorous definitions that limit scope field, no texts that comprehensively state its foundations, and little agreement among its practitioners about which frameworks or methods offer most promise for unifying field. (1985, 27) There is nothing inherently wrong with vagueness, fragmentation, or loose definitions, course; Renaissance Humanism was built on such a foundation. What is unsettling about interpersonal communication's crisis character, though, is reticence exhibited by field's theorists to explore connections with distant past. Perusing footnotes, indexes, and bibliographies contemporary interpersonal communication research and pedagogy, one works back only as far as relatively recent [social scientists and other] figures such as Martin Buber, Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow, Eric Fromm, R. D. Laing, and Eric Berne. This suspiciously brief official history is verified in Handbook Interpersonal Communication, in which Mark Knapp and Gerald Miller assert that concerted interest in study interpersonal communication processes and outcomes is relatively recent origin, and that the study interpersonal communication did not commence to bloom profusely until 1960's (8). Knapp and Miller's suggestion that the study interpersonal communication has thus far progressed only from infancy to adolescence (1 1) further supports widespread belief that discipline is extremely young. The central argument this essay-that scholars interpersonal communication, in an effort to define their discipline in modern terms, have mistakenly cut themselves off from their true roots and from much liberal-arts tradition-is built upon three principal contentions. First, interpersonal communication is not of relatively recent origin, but is, in fact, an ancient study, dating back at least as far as Plato. Second, interpersonal communication grew out a healthful, invigorating competition with ancient rhetorical theory and practice. In order to understand claims, power, and limitations one, we must have an appreciation for, or at least an understanding of, other. Third, interpersonal communication specialists, both in their research and in classroom, should highlight their field's long and enlightening battle with

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1990-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773949009390874
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (53)

  1. Adler Ronald B. (1988)
    Understanding Human Communication.
  2. Adler Ronald B. (1990)
    Looking Out/Looking In.
  3. Ambrester M.L. (1984)
    A Rhetoric of Interpersonal Communication
  4. Aristotle (1954)
    Rhetoric and Poetics
  5. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00209.x
     ↗
Show all 53 →
  1. 10.1080/00335635809382317
     ↗
  2. Blair Hugh (1965)
    Lectures On Rhetoric and Belles Lettres
  3. Bochner Arthur P. (1982)
    Communication Yearbook
  4. Bolton Robert (1979)
    People Skills: How to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others, and Resolve Basic Conflicts
  5. Booth Wayne (1974)
    Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent
  6. Bormann Ernest G. (1988)
    Effective Small Group Communication.
  7. Brockriede Wayne (1972)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  8. 10.1080/00335634509381126
     ↗
  9. Buber Martin (1965)
    The Knowledge of Man
  10. Cissna Kenneth (1981)
    Rigor and Imagination: Essays from the Legacy of Gregory Bateson
  11. Cohen Herman (1963)
    10.1080/10417946309371707
    Southern Speech Journal  ↗
  12. Curran Jane V. (1986)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  13. Delia Jesse G. (1982)
    Comparative Human Communication Thory
  14. Eadie W. F. (1982)
    10.1080/10417948209372524
    Southern Speech Communication Journal  ↗
  15. Friedman Maurice (1983)
    The Confirmation of Otherness in Family, Community, and Society
  16. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00344.x
     ↗
  17. 10.1080/00335638609383757
     ↗
  18. Hayakawa S.I. (1964)
    Language in Thought and Action
  19. Home Henry (1967)
    The Elements of Criticism
  20. 10.1080/00335638309383646
     ↗
  21. Infante Dominique (1988)
    Arguing Constructively
  22. Johnson David W. (1981)
    Reaching Out: Interpersonal Effectiveness and Self‐Actualization.
  23. Kauffman Charles (1979)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  24. Kelley William G. (1973)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  25. Knapp Mark (1985)
    Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
  26. Lanham Richard (1976)
    Motives of Eloquence
  27. Luft Joseph (1969)
    Of Human Interaction
  28. 10.1080/03637758809376159
     ↗
  29. Plato (1987)
    Gorgias
  30. 10.2307/449616
     ↗
  31. Quimby Rollin W. (1974)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  32. 10.1080/03637758309390150
     ↗
  33. Rendall Steven (1977)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  34. Rogers Carl (1962)
    Harvard Educational Review
  35. Rubin Rebecca B. (1988)
    The Road Trip: An Interpersonal Adventure
  36. Sieburg Evelyn (1976)
    Communication in Organizations
  37. Smith Adam (1971)
    Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres
  38. 10.1080/00335637409383211
     ↗
  39. Stanhope Philip Dormer (1912)
    Letters Written by Lord Chesterfield to His Son
  40. Stewart John (1988)
    Together: Communicating Interpersonally.
  41. Stewart John (1990)
    Bridges Not Walls: A Book about Interpersonal Communication.
  42. Trenholm Sarah (1988)
    Interpersonal Communication
  43. 10.1080/01463378609369629
     ↗
  44. 10.1080/00335638509383730
     ↗
  45. 10.1080/03634528109378478
     ↗
  46. _____ (1985)
    Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
  47. _____ (1985)
    Speech Communication in the Twentieth Century
  48. _____ (1956)
    Phaedrus
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2024
    Entrepreneurial Mindsets & Rhetorical Canons: Enhancing Business Communication Pedagogy via Cross-disciplinary Theory, Praxis ↗
    Josie A. Burks; Craig E. Armstrong
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy professional writing
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jul 2023
    Being-Moved: Rhetoric as the Art of Listening ↗
    Nathaniel A. Rivers
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development argument public rhetoric book reviews
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2022
    Architects of Memory: Information and Rhetoric in a Networked Archival Age ↗
    Rachel Stroup
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development scientific writing archival research
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022
    Arguing with Numbers: The Intersection of Rhetoric and Mathematics ↗
    Christopher Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy argument qualitative research gender and writing book reviews editorial matter
  5. Rhetorica Jun 2021
    Weeping for Dido: The Classics in the Medieval Classroom by Marjorie Curry Woods ↗
    Jordan Loveridge
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development gender and writing book reviews