Abstract

This paper examines the comparative usefulness of seeking to explain metaphor through the notions of ambiguity and vagueness. I argue that, despite long standing attempts to explain metaphor as a species of ambiguous language, all such attempts fail. I also argue that a less explored association, that between metaphor and vague language, can be exploited much more successfully in explaining a quite different aspect of metaphor‐why speakers might choose that trope over literal utterance in everyday contexts.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1983-06-01
DOI
10.1080/02773948309390697
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (5)

  1. Austin, J.L. 1965.HOW to Do Things with Words, Edited by: Urmson, J.O. 147 ffNew York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Psychological Bulletin
  3. Scheffler, Israel. 1979.Beyond the Letter, 79–128. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  4. Syntax and Semantics Vol. III: Speech Acts
  5. Educational Theory