Abstract

This article explores the rhetorical nature of “tangled” memories, what Marita Sturken describes as an intermeshing of sanctioned histories with personal and/or public narratives. To exemplify this phenomenon, the author examines the public memories of Rose O’Neal Greenhow and Belle Boyd. Greenhow and Boyd actively promoted slavery in their published accounts yet common “retellings” of their lives often elide these positions, and instead focus on their sensational work as Confederate spies. Such a reframing depicts them as progressive women, creating a tangled memory that uncritically lionizes them. Ultimately, the author argues, more complex “retellings” of historical figures are needed.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2019-07-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2019.1628526
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00335630209384386
  2. Communication as … : Perspectives on Theory
  3. Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory
  4. 10.2307/378973
    College English  
  5. 10.1080/1041794X.2017.1332448
  6. 10.2307/3518951
    Feminist Studies  
  7. 10.1525/rep.1989.26.1.99p0274v
    Representation  
  8. 10.1080/10570311003680600
  9. 10.1057/9780230524231_1
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →