Abstract

The recently diagnosed “broadening imperative” in revisionary historiography is of special concern to feminist historians, for whom critique of traditional methodological presuppositions has been central to the feminist revisionary project. By examining the performative and figurative elements of feminist historiographical discourse, feminist historians and historiographers can both identify sites of feminist rhetorical resistance to traditional presuppositions, and gain an understanding of how feminist revisionary methodologies have been re-assimilated into traditional methodological and rhetorical paradigms.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2017-07-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2017.1317571
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College English

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. College English
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. College English
Show all 10 →
  1. College English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  2. Without Alibi
  3. 10.2307/378936
    College English  
  4. 10.2307/359005
  5. 10.1520/STP20024S
  6. Rhetorica in Motion
  7. The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →