Holes, God-shaped and Otherwise: A Response toRight Talkand Philip C. Wander

Joshua Gunn The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1Bob Scott, my PhD adviser, uses this phrase to describe relatively uninteresting, scientistic, or cookie-cutter modes of rhetorical criticism. 2Ronald Walter Greene, for example, has been critiquing the neoliberal rhetoric that concerns Smith for some years (see “Rhetorical Capital”; “Rhetoric and Capitalism”). 3I think we could even argue that in the twentieth century, rhetorical studies adopted such a one-sided approach until Burke was taken up and rhetoric-as-seduction eclipsed argumentation, the supplication of good reasons, and so forth. Even so, attempts to more directly engage emotional appeals and affect have been met with some derision (for example, Brockriede; Corder). For a recent, excellent attempt to engage the affect of rhetoric, see Thomas Rickert's Acts of Enjoyment.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2008-03-25
DOI
10.1080/07350190801921909
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (6) · 1 in this index

  1. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. A Voice and Nothing More
  4. Lacan to the Letter: Reading Ècrits Closely
  5. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America
Show all 6 →
  1. Acts of Enjoyment: Rhetoric, Zizek, and the Return of the Subject