Abstract

This essay examines style as a vehicle for performance: Patterns of language are rituals of language that participate in broader social rituals and behaviors. It then turns to recent debates over academic prose, focusing on Judith Butler who claims that radical thought demands radical forms of expression. In the case of her own writing, however, her style isn't radical. Instead, it's conservative in form, a souped-up version of technobureaucratic writing. The essay ends with an analysis of Butler's "Burning Acts, Injurious Speech" and argues that while it does fulfill one of the aesthetic goals Butler has outlined elsewhere, the stylistic performance it delivers is like that of a shaman, hovering ambiguously between mysticism and trickery.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2005-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2402_4
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College English
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.
  2. Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.
  3. 10.2307/1144856
    Drama Review  
  4. Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996.
  5. Salih, Sara. Judith Butler. London: New York, 2002.
  6. Schechner, Richard. Between Theater & Anthropology. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1985.
  7. 10.2307/466856
    Social Text 46-47 (  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →