Abstract

This essay interrogates the dominant conception of natural ability in classical rhetoric, the necessary-but-not-sufficient theory of aptitude. It describes articulations of this commonplace, by Quintilian and Plato, and then specifically examines Isocrates' problematic affirmation and resistance to a highly determinant version of aptitude. This essay suggests that in the context of contemporary composition studies, Isocratic ambivalence may represent a productive strategy in order to reinvigorate dormant inquiries in language, human nature, and ethics, and to contest powerful attitudes and assumptions that currently champion the primacy of natural ability over experience.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2004-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2304_1
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. College English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. Brown, JoAnne. The Definition of a Profession: The Authority of Metaphor in the History of Intelligence Testi…
  2. Heath, Shirley Brice. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cam…
  3. Isocrates. Against the Sophists. Isocrates. Vol 2. Trans. George Norlin. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1929. 160-77.
  4. Isocrates: Harvard UP, 1929.
  5. Isocrates: Harvard UP, 1928.
  6. 10.2307/3594170
    College Composition and Communication 54.3 (  
  7. Mirhady, David, et al. Introduction. Isocrates I. By Isocrates. Trans. David Mirhady and Yun Lee Too. Austin:…
  8. Pindar. Nemean Odes, Isthmian Odes, Fragments. Trans. William H. Race. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997.
  9. Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria, Book 1. Trans. H. E. Butler. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996.
  10. 10.2307/357468
    College Composition and Communication 39.3 (  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →