Rhetoric Review Sep 2000

Mina Shaughnessy and K. Patricia cross: The forgotten debate over postseeondary remediation

Patricia J. Mcalexander

Abstract

Mina Shaughnessy has long been revered as leader, even founder, of basic-writing movement, which emerged from open-admissions educational policies of egalitarian 1960s. Throughout 1970s, 80s, and 90s, most professionals in have accepted role of basic writing as defined by Shaughnessy in Errors and Expectations and as enacted in classrooms of City University of New York, where action of book took place. Indeed, Jeanne Gunner calls Shaughnessy's work the starting point of reference for these professionals (28); seldom does a discussion of basic writing not referand defer-to Shaughnessy.' In spite of almost universal acclaim for Shaughnessy, some articles about work have appeared with contradictory, even negative, visions: Paul Hunter describes Shaughnessy as radical for caring so much about and believing in students, most of whom were minorities; Min-Zhan Lu describes as conservative-and a gatekeeper and accommodationist-for wanting to acculturate them. And while no doubt both Hunter and Lu have captured truths about Shaughnessy, CCNY's Patricia Laurence argues that historical dimension is missing from many such analyses, that they set Shaughnessy adrift on educational raft-unmoored from [her] times, [her] institution, [her] field (880). In essay describing these intra-community conflict[s] (26), Gunner argues that literature about Shaughnessy can be categorized into two forms of discourse: iconic and critical. In iconic discourse Shaughnessy is invoked as a figure and symbol with meaning beyond identity as historic person (26). Time editor Stephen Koepp, in issue on heroes and icons, defines icon as an embodiment of ideal that affects way we live act, for better worse. Only possibility of or worse, in fact, really differentiates Koepp's icon from his hero-one who changes society for better by shatter[ing] a limitation convention (6). Certainly, iconic literature of basic writing invokes Shaughnessy as positive icon-as a hero. The imagery in eulogies describing Shaughnessy shortly after death set tone for this type of literature: Irving Howe spoke of the brightness of her (102); E. D. Hirsch, Jr., described how human influence radiated out (96); Adrienne Rich stressed way work illuminates (102).

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2000-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350190009359276
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis basic writing argument body and rhetoric
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (37) · 1 in this index

  1. Breneman David W. (1999)
    The Chronicle of Higher Education
  2. Cross Patricia K. (1976)
    Accent on Learning: Improving Instruction and Reshaping the Curriculum
  3. _____ (1971)
    Beyond the Open Door: New Students in Higher Education
  4. _____ (1968)
    The Junior College Student: A Research Description
  5. Gross Theodore L. (1978)
    Saturday Review
Show all 37 →
  1. Gunner Jeanne (1998)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1998.17.2.03
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  2. Heller Louis G. (1973)
    The Death of the American University
  3. Henry William A. (1994)
    Time
  4. Hirsch E. D. (1994)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1994.13.1.08
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  5. Goldstone Richard (1979)
    City College Alumnus
  6. (1994)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1994.13.1.09
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  7. 10.2307/378445
     ↗
  8. Koepp Stephen (1999)
    Time
  9. Lavin David E. (1996)
    Changing the Odds: Open Admissions and the Life Chances of the Disadvantaged
  10. Laurence et al. (1993)
    Symposium on Basic Writing, Conflict and Struggle, and the Legacy of Mina Shaughnessy
    College English
  11. Lu Min‐Zhan (1991)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1991.10.1.04
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  12. 10.2307/376358
     ↗
  13. Lunsford Andrea (1990)
    Research in Basic Writing: A Bibliographic Sourcebook
  14. Lyons Robert (1985)
    Traditions of Inquiry
  15. Maher Jane (1997)
    Mina P. Shaughnessy: Her Life and Work
  16. Goldstone Richard (1994)
    Journal of Basic Writing
  17. Shaughnessy Mina P. (1976)
    Teaching Composition: Ten Bibliographic Essays
  18. 10.2307/357036
     ↗
  19. _____ (1980)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1980.3.1.08
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  20. _____ (1977)
    Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing
  21. _____ (1980)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1980.3.1.11
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  22. _____ (1980)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1980.3.1.10
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  23. _____ (1970)
    Washington Square
  24. Shor Ira (1998)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1998.17.1.08
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  25. _____ (1997)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1997.16.1.08
    The Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  26. _____ (1975)
    Teaching English in the Two‐Year College
  27. Smitherman Geneva (1977)
    Talkin’ and Testifyin’: The Language of Black America
  28. Traub James (1994)
    City on a Hill: Testing the American Dream at City College
  29. _____ (1994)
    The New Yorker
  30. Unger Irwin (1974)
    The Movement: A History of the American New Left 1959–1972
  31. Widmer Kingsley (1969)
    The Nation
  32. Yaworski JoAnn (1996)
    “Why Students Succeed or Fail: Theories of Underachieving Affluent College Students”
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Dec 2024
    American Kairos: Washington National Cathedral and the New Civil Religion ↗
    Randall Fowler
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument archival research race and writing gender and writing public rhetoric body and rhetoric place and space editorial matter
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024
    Where’s the Rhetoric? Imagining a Unified Field ↗
    Joshua Hanan
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  3. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024
    The Evolution of Pragmatism in India: Ambedkar, Dewey, and the Rhetoric of Reconstruction ↗
    Isaac James Richards
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument archival research empirical research race and writing affect and writing body and rhetoric book reviews
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024
    Rhetorical Leadership ↗
    Catherine L. Langford
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis feminist rhetorics cultural rhetorics decolonial rhetorics graduate education argument empirical research qualitative research race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2023
    Persons of the Market: Conservatism, Corporate Personhood, and Economic Theology ↗
    Crystal Broch Colombini
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument labor and working conditions race and writing public rhetoric body and rhetoric