Teaching rhetorical values and the question of student autonomy

Dennis A. Lynch Michigan Technological University

Abstract

question, should teachers bring their politics into the classroom, is a question that is vague and, in the final analysis, only useful as a scare-tactic. It may sound straightforward, but it quickly dissolves into a variety of more specific possible interpretations: Should a teacher insist that students adopt in their writing a particular political position under threat of failure; should a teacher encourage students to adopt a particular political position; should a teacher argue for a particular political position in class; should a teacher expose students to political positions that are contrary to those the students already hold; should a teacher encourage or permit students to express any and all of their beliefs and opinions, even those that other students might find offensive; should a teacher show students how to critically examine beliefs, political or otherwise, and ask students to critically examine their own beliefs; should a teacher raise the possibility that the beliefs we have come to hold are interconnected and symbolically charged in ways that may prevent us from straightforwardly examining them; should a teacher design assignments around controversial political issues and insist that students engage (e.g., argue with others and defend their own position); should a teacher avoid all references to specific political issues and train students to write clear, grammatically correct prose? And, of course, there are many other ways of hearing the question. If we are to resist the question, should teachers bring their politics into the classroom, then, in favor of a question or questions that bring out more clearly what is at stake for us in the discussion of politics in the classroom, we may want to begin with a closer examination of the relationship between educational and political aims-which is precisely the direction we seem to be going in, if articles such as Patricia Bizzell's The of Virtue, Richard Marius's Politics in the Classroom, Louise Wetherbee Phelps', A Constrained Vision of the Writing Classroom, Donald Lazere's Teaching

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1995-03-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199509359192
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College English

References (44) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1080/10417947209372170
    The Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  2. Rhetoric
  3. The Ends of Rhetoric
  4. 10.2307/377477
  5. 10.1632/ade.103.4
    ADE Bulletin  
Show all 44 →
  1. The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary.
  2. Feminists Theorize the Political
  3. The Art of Wondering
  4. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  5. Contending with Words
  6. Foucault: A Critical Reader
  7. 10.1080/10510978109368086
    Central States Speech Journal  
  8. Norms of Rhetorical Culture
  9. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
  10. Notes in the Margins
  11. 10.2307/378606
  12. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse
  13. Essays on the Rhetoric of the Western World
  14. 10.2307/357563
  15. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity
  16. Fragments of Redemption
  17. Contending With Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age
  18. Composition and Resistance
  19. Works
  20. Rhetoric in the Vortex of Cultural Studies
  21. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture
  22. Contending with Words
  23. The Art of Persuasion in Greece
  24. The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing
  25. 10.2307/357564
  26. Perelman's New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century
  27. Rhetorical Power
  28. ADE Bulletin
  29. 10.2307/378334
  30. The New Rhetoric
  31. 10.1632/ade.103.13
    ADE Bulletin  
  32. The Republic and Gorgias. The Collected Dialogues of Plato
  33. 10.1080/00335637809383442
  34. 10.1017/CBO9780511609039
  35. 10.1080/10510977609367889
    Central States Speech Journal  
  36. College Composition and Communication
  37. The Rhetorical Turn
  38. Defence of Rhetoric
  39. The Contemporary Reception of Classical Rhetoric: Appropriations of Ancient Discourse