The Path Intended and the Path Taken: A Rejoinder to Dr. O’Connell

Molly Margaret Kessler; S. Scott Graham

doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1692910

Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2020

The Path Intended and the Path Taken: A Rejoinder to Dr. O’Connell

Molly Margaret Kessler ; S. Scott Graham The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

With the goal of increasing interdisciplinary dialogue, the authors engage Dr. O’Connell’s response to “Terminal node problems: ANT 2.0 and prescription drug labels.” Specifically, the authors aim to address the questions and concerns raised by Dr. O’Connell as well as offer suggestions for future research that builds on the insights that emerge from this interdisciplinary dialectic.

Journal: Technical Communication Quarterly
Published: 2020-01-02
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2019.1692910
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (5) · 2 in this index

10.4324/9781315303758-7

↗
Kessler et al. (2018)

Terminal node problems: ANT 2.0 and prescription drug labels

Technical Communication Quarterly
Latour B. (1987)

Science in Action
MOORE (1996)

Instrumental Discourse is as Humanistic as Rhetoric

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
wetwebwork (2008)

Desire path

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

The Path Intended and the Path Taken: A Rejoinder to Dr. O’Connell

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (5) · 2 in this index

Related Articles