Abstract

Abstract This article answers Carl Hemdl's call for furthering critical approaches to research in professional communication by forwarding Kenneth Burke's concepts of symbolic action, dramatism, and the pentad. This article illustrates, through an analysis of data gathered in a case study of technical writers, how Burke provides us with tools that can produce more varied terministic screens for how critical researchers conceptualize, interpret, and analyze workplace communication.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2002-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1104_1
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/258283
  2. 10.1080/10417949609373019
    The Southern Communication Journal  
  3. 10.1080/00335630109384315
    QJ  
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →