Editors’ Introduction: Decolonizing Research in the Teaching of English(es)
Abstract
Text-driven, quantitative methods provide new ways to analyze student writing, by uncovering recurring grammatical features and related stylistic effects that remain tacit to students and those who read and evaluate student writing. To date, however, these methods are rarely used in research on students transitioning into US postsecondary writing, and especially rare are studies of student writing that is already scored according to high-stakes writing expectations. This study offers a corpus-based, comparative analysis of higher- and lower-scoring Advanced Placement (AP) exams in English, revealing statistically significant syntactic patterns that distinguish higher-scoring exams according to “informational production” and lower-scoring essays according to “involved” or “interactional” production (Biber, 1988). These differences contribute to what we label emphatic generality in the lower-scoring essays, in which writers tend to foreground human actors, including themselves. In contrast, patterns in higher-scoring essays achieve what we call elaborated specificity, by focusing on and explicating specific, often abstract, concepts.These findings help uncover what is rewarded (or not) in high-stakes writing assessments and show that some students struggle with register awareness. A related implication, then, is the importance of teaching register awareness to students at the late secondary and early university level—students who are still relative novices, but are being invited to compose informationally dense prose. Such register considerations, and specific features revealed in this study, provide ways to help demystify privileged writing forms for students, particularly students for whom academic writing may seem distant from their own communicative practices and ambitions.
- Journal
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/rte201527346
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2019Testing the Test: Expanding the Dialogue on Technical Writing Assessment in the Academy and Workplace ↗Lindsay Tanner; Jon Balzotti
-
Research in the Teaching of English May 2017Elaborated Specificity versus Emphatic Generality: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Higher- and Lower-Scoring Advanced Placement Exams in English ↗David West Brown; Laura L. Aull
-
College Composition and Communication Jun 2014The Legal and the Local: Using Disparate Impact Analysis to Understand the Consequences of Writing Assessment ↗Mya Poe; Norbert Elliot; John Aloysius Cogan; Tito G. Nurudeen
-
College Composition and Communication Jun 2013Anne Ruggles Gere; Laura Aull; Moisés Damián Perales Escudero; Zak Lancaster; Elizabeth Vander Lei
-
Research in the Teaching of English Feb 2012Norbert Elliot; Perry Deess; Alex Rudniy; Kamal Joshi