Abstract

Is there a difference in the dominant leadership style between technical and non-technical superiors? Which leadership style of superiors will give their subordinates more freedom on the job? By using House's Path-Goal Model [1] in a study involving a survey of subordinates of 100 technical and 100 non-technical companies in Singapore, I found that technical superiors tend to adopt a supportive leadership style, while non-technical superiors adopt a more achievement-oriented one. This manifests in significant differences between the two kinds of superiors in the extent of the leader's position power (formal authority), the degree of autonomy subordinates want, and the extent subordinates control their goal achievements.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.2190/y1qw-4bqu-r178-l3gt
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (23) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.2307/2391905
  2. Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications
  3. Human Relations in Organization
  4. Organisational Behaviour
  5. Industrial/Occupational Psychology
Show all 23 →
  1. 10.1016/0263-2373(96)00042-4
  2. Management International Review
  3. 10.1016/0737-6782(91)90027-V
  4. 10.2307/2392855
  5. 10.1108/01437739410059863
  6. 10.1177/001872679404700806
  7. 10.1177/002194369303000203
  8. 10.1037/h0076551
  9. 10.1037/h0054601
  10. New Approaches to Effective Leadership: Cognitive Resources and Organisational Performance
  11. Harvard Business Review
  12. Work and Motivation
  13. Training and Development Journal
  14. 10.2307/257756
  15. Journal of Contemporary Business
  16. Motivation and Personality
  17. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  18. 10.2190/1AH7-KV1H-TK5E-38EA