Abstract

Examining the history of science from the perspective of metaphor suggests that there are few differences between the literal and the metaphorical in scientific discourse. The central role of metaphors in science seems to ensure that science is open-ended, suggesting that conceptions of reality will always be open to change and interpretation.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1995-01-01
DOI
10.2190/0fgd-k5ar-b2rf-42wf
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (18)

  1. The Cosmic Code
  2. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought
  3. 10.1002/andp.19063240303
  4. Albert Einstein, Creator and Rebel
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511609039.002
Show all 18 →
  1. Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding
  2. The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle
  3. The Rule of Metaphor
  4. 10.7591/9781501741326
  5. Models and Analogies in Science
  6. 10.1086/289207
  7. 10.2307/2709953
  8. Grammar of Motives
  9. On Metaphor
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511527234
  11. The Principle of Relativity
  12. Eight Lectures on Theoretical Physics
  13. The Principle of Relativity