Scientists: Can They Read What They Write?

Lloyd R. Bostian University of Wisconsin–Madison ; Ann C. Thering University of Wisconsin–Madison

Abstract

We evaluated scientists' abilities to process two writing styles, active and nominal in comprehension and reading speed, and determined their preferences for these styles. International scientists (with English as a first, second, or third language) were tested. Results show scientists comprehend nominal style as well as active style but process nominal style more slowly. Scientists with lower levels of English experience have proportionately greater difficulty processing nominal style than active style. Scientists prefer active writing to nominal writing and rate scientists who write actively higher than those who write nominally. Scientists should use more active style and technical editors should apply a heavy hand to nominal style.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1987-10-01
DOI
10.2190/q4yk-umcu-d6bw-3age
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1515/9783112316009
  2. 10.1037/h0044708
  3. 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80103-6
  4. 10.1080/00335636909382969
  5. 10.1037/h0040440
  6. 10.2307/377065
  7. 10.2466/pr0.1963.13.3.651
  8. 10.1177/107769908306000408
  9. 10.1177/107769908406100330
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →