Writing Medical Records

Michael P. Pagano ; David Mair University of Oklahoma

Abstract

A study was undertaken both to evaluate how medical students are taught to write patient records and to examine the writing done by doctors. Typical medical records, written by medical doctors, were also evaluated. A single questionnaire was sent to eighty-four medical school professors, twenty law school faculty, and five practicing attorneys. The questionnaire asked how medical records were used and what the legal implications were in authoring a patient record. The medical professionals were also asked how their schools taught medical writing. The questionnaire pointed out that most medical schools teach less than ten hours of medical writing in their curricula and that patient records are not written with an understanding of the various audiences, purposes, and uses for medical documents. Two radiology reports are discussed in terms of their clarity and usefulness for medical and extra-medical readers. The study concludes that medical students should be taught a composing process so that they will understand the audience, purpose, and use for the patient records they write.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1986-10-01
DOI
10.2190/wy9t-634e-v2jt-jdvq
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bjork R. and Oye R. K., Writing Courses in American Medical Schools, Journal of Medical Education, pp. 112, 1…
  2. Woolliscroft J. O. Evaluating the Medical History: Observation Versus Write-up Review, Journal of Medical Edu…
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →