Normative Pluralism and the Other

Nicholas Dunn University of Lethbridge

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this article is to consider the issue of how we conceive of others when engaging in the activity of perspective taking. Are we supposed to think from the standpoint of abstract and generalized others? Or should we strive to engage with concrete, particular others? The article suggests that what matters is that we encounter the other in their particularity rather than their generality—and that this distinction cuts across the more frequently invoked, modal distinction between possibility and actuality. In other words, what is relevant is not whether the other exists or not, but whether we encounter them in all their individuality and uniqueness.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0069
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (16)

  1. The Human Condition
  2. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought
  3. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy
  4. Responsibility and Judgment
  5. Hannah Arendt / Karl Jaspers Correspondence, 1926–1969
Show all 16 →
  1. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy
  2. Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt
  3. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics
  4. Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy
  5. “Plurality and the Potential for Agreement: Arendt, Kant, and the ‘Way of Thinking’ of th…
    Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory  
  6. Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics
  7. Critique of Pure Reason
  8. Critique of the Power of Judgment
  9. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View
  10. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy
  11. “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.”
    Political Theory