Normative Pluralism and the Other

Nicholas Dunn University of Lethbridge

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this article is to consider the issue of how we conceive of others when engaging in the activity of perspective taking. Are we supposed to think from the standpoint of abstract and generalized others? Or should we strive to engage with concrete, particular others? The article suggests that what matters is that we encounter the other in their particularity rather than their generality—and that this distinction cuts across the more frequently invoked, modal distinction between possibility and actuality. In other words, what is relevant is not whether the other exists or not, but whether we encounter them in all their individuality and uniqueness.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0069
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Plurality and the Potential for Agreement: Arendt, Kant, and the ‘Way of Thinking’ of th…
    Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory  
  2. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy
  3. “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.”
    Political Theory  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →