Getting the World in View: What Talk Can Do

Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025

Getting the World in View: What Talk Can Do

Rachel Wahl University of Virginia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hannah Arendt insisted that people who share a society should talk to each other in order to inhabit as far as possible the views of fellow citizens. While for Arendt, the aim of such thinking is to consider other citizens’ views when evaluating issues, this article suggests another purpose that is more readily available in highly polarized contexts. In such settings, “representative thinking” may be best equipped to reveal the conceptions of the good that motivate views with which one disagrees. In antagonistic contexts such as the contemporary United States in which many people doubt that others’ opinions are premised on any sense of the good, this recognition can provide the groundwork for better relations between citizens, by cultivating acknowledgment of those with whom one deeply disagrees as legitimate cocreators of democratic society.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2025-04-01
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0056
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓

(2005)

“Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.”

Acta Politica ↗
(1999)

“Deliberation = Legitimacy = Democracy.”

Political Theory ↗
(1987)

“On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.”

Political Theory ↗
(2024)

“‘If You Say You Believe This, Then Why Did You Vote Like That?’ Reasoning as Questioning…

Educational Theory ↗
(2022)

“Agonism, Democracy, and the Moral Equality of Voice.”

Political Theory ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →