Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025

Getting the World in View: What Talk Can Do

Rachel Wahl University of Virginia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hannah Arendt insisted that people who share a society should talk to each other in order to inhabit as far as possible the views of fellow citizens. While for Arendt, the aim of such thinking is to consider other citizens’ views when evaluating issues, this article suggests another purpose that is more readily available in highly polarized contexts. In such settings, “representative thinking” may be best equipped to reveal the conceptions of the good that motivate views with which one disagrees. In antagonistic contexts such as the contemporary United States in which many people doubt that others’ opinions are premised on any sense of the good, this recognition can provide the groundwork for better relations between citizens, by cultivating acknowledgment of those with whom one deeply disagrees as legitimate cocreators of democratic society.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0056
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (19)

  1. (2004)
    Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship Since Brown v. Board of Education
  2. (1961)
    Between Past and Future
  3. (1993)
    Habermas and the Public Sphere
  4. (1940)
    Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us
  5. (2024)
    Democracy and Education
Show all 19 →
  1. (2012)
    The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry
  2. (2018)
    Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
  3. (2005)
    “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.”
    Acta Politica  ↗
  4. (1975)
    Legitimation Crisis
  5. (1985)
    The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeword and System: A Critique of Function…
  6. (1999)
    “Deliberation = Legitimacy = Democracy.”
    Political Theory  ↗
  7. (1987)
    “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.”
    Political Theory  ↗
  8. (2018)
    Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
  9. (2017)
    Law’s Hermeneutics
  10. University of Pennsylvania Paideia Program. n.d. https://snfpaideia.upenn.edu/listen-with-a-willingness-to-be…
  11. (2024)
    “‘If You Say You Believe This, Then Why Did You Vote Like That?’ Reasoning as Questioning…
    Educational Theory  ↗
  12. (2022)
    “Agonism, Democracy, and the Moral Equality of Voice.”
    Political Theory  ↗
  13. (2002)
    Inclusion and Democracy
  14. (2019)
    A Democratic Theory of Judgment
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →