Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025

The Problem of Democratic Persuasion

Linda M. G. Zerilli University of Chicago

Abstract

ABSTRACT What is the problem of democratic persuasion today? Looking at the complex cases of what Robert Fogelin calls “deep disagreement,” this essay brings Hannah Arendt and Ludwig Wittgenstein into a critical dialogue about the possibilities for persuasive speech. Questioning the received reading of “form of life” and “worldview” as the hard limit on such speech, it argues for a world-opening approach to persuasion where shared premises are missing. By contrast with those who reduce persuading to convincing based on such premises, Wittgenstein and Arendt show how to create them. Persuasion involves not convincing an interlocutor to adopt one’s point of view but learning to see from different points of view: a practice that Arendt calls “seeing politically” and Wittgenstein calls “seeing an aspect.”

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0013
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (12)

  1. (1990)
    “Philosophy and Politics.”
    Social Research
  2. (2003)
  3. (2005)
    The Promise of Politics
  4. (2000)
    “What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects?”
    Philosophical Investigations  ↗
  5. (1976)
    Must We Mean What We Say?
Show all 12 →
  1. (1985)
    “The Logic of Deep Disagreements.”
    Informal Logic
  2. (2021)
    Rhetoric as Philosophy: The Humanist Tradition
  3. (1955)
    “Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930–33.”
    Mind
  4. (2001)
    Inheritance and Originality, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard
  5. (2002)
    “Criticism and Captivity: On Genealogy and Critical Theory.”
    European Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  6. (1972)
    Über Gewissheit / On Certainty
  7. (1977)
    Philosophical Investigations
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Book Review: Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos PickeringK. (2024). Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos. Utah State University Press, 268 pp. ↗
    Mia Twomey
    argument book reviews
  2. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  4. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma?: An Analysis of the Medical Debates Over the Diagnosis and Treatment of “Transsexualism” ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research
  5. Argumentation Mar 2026
    The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered ↗
    Shiyang Yu
    argument