Abstract

ABSTRACT This article critiques Google’s conversion of knowledge into information from the perspective of linguistic performance. It claims that the political effects of signification are resistant to discrete or fixed translations, where instead the incalculable dimensions of knowledge emerge between languages—that is, in-translation. To do so, the article reads Barbara Cassin’s extensive work on sophistics, untranslatability theory, and Google itself to argue that the unfinishability of performance, translation, and the dimensions of meaning are the openings to political life. Cassin’s insight, that “we never stop (not) translating,” emphasizes the value of performance, one foreclosed by Google’s squaring of doxa. The article analyzes the historical transmission and scholarly impact of knowledge to argue that understanding comes from an uncertain staging of knowledge between languages—languages, that is, always among others.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0245
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Politics of Memory on Treatments of Hate.”
    Javnost—The Public  
  2. “From Organism to Picnic: Which Consensus for Which City?”
    Angelaki  
  3. “The Energy of the Untranslatables: Translation as a Paradigm for the Human Sciences.”
    Paragraph  
  4. “Reading Literature and the Political Ecology of Gestures in the Age of Semiocapitalism.”
    New Literary History  
  5. “Rethinking ‘Impact’: Between the Attention Economy and the Readerless Republic of Letters.”
    SubStance  
  6. “Life Inside Logos: Discourse, Anthropogenesis and World-Effects in Cassin and Sloterdijk.”
    Paragraph  
  7. “Barbara Cassin: Sophistical Reading.”
    Diacritics  
  8. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Persp…
    Feminist Studies  
  9. “On the Possibilities of a Political Theory of Algorithms.”
    Political Theory  
  10. “Five Theses on Technoliberalism and the Networked Public Sphere.”
    Communication and the Public  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →