Abstract

ABSTRACT This article approaches the problem of post-truth and the opposition between philosophical dialectics and sophistic rhetoric. The antagonism is addressed through a reading of Žižek's depiction of the ongoing discussion between Alain Badiou and Barbara Cassin, the “new version of the ancient dialogue between Plato and the sophists,” as stained by sexual difference, and the dialectics between Parmenides and Gorgias. The article argues that only through acknowledging the inescapable failure of these sides to ever establish a complete totality are we capable of overcoming the antagonism that resides at their core, thus making a dialectical sophistics, on the basis of Žižek's thought, possible. Thus, only by taking the path through post-truth can we attempt to reach the disavowed core of truth that haunts every failed system.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2020-05-22
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.53.2.0134
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Badiou, Alain. 2017. “Formulas of ‘L'Étourdit.’” In There's No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lesso…
  2. Cassin, Barbara. 2000. “Who's Afraid of the Sophists? Against Ethical Correctness.” Trans. Charles T. Wolfe. …
  3. Cassin, Barbara. 2017. “Ab-Sense, or Lacan from A to D.” In There's No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: T…
  4. McComiskey, Bruce. 2017. Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.
  5. Poulakos, John. 1990. “Hegel's Reception of the Sophists.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 54 (2): 16…
  6. Žižek, Slavoj. 2017. Incontinence of the Void: Economico-Philosophical Spandrels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →