Abstract

ABSTRACT Invoking the work of Maurice Blanchot, this text is situated in the (im)possibility of contemporary debate and the impossible, but necessary, question of (un)avowable community. Arguing that identity politics today forecloses debate in the syntactical closures of the named name, we follow Blanchot to open onto a paratactical politics of community. The parataxis (polysyndeton) is here the key trope of community and communication: the side-by-side arrangement of fragments that puts into play the seeming self-evidence of contemporary conjunctions, relations of subordination, and temporal sequence. The parataxis configures relations of alterity, radicalized in death, where the (non)being-in-common of self-other and self-self are exposed. Taking as instance the disaster of Donald Trump's presidency and the digital conveyances of identity, we explore this joke, its common currents, and the possibility for a paratactical politics of community when the joke is on us.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2019-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.52.1.0078
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1990. “Postmodern Parataxis: Embodied Texts, Weightless Information.” American Literary…
  2. Perelman, Bob. 1993. “Parataxis and Narrative: The New Sentence in Theory and Practice.” American Literature …
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →