Abstract

AbstractThis article explores the question of how we should conceive of the aesthetic dimensions of politics that Rancière identifies. Among some interpreters of Rancière, there is a tendency to posit a binary opposition between the aesthetically transformative dimensions of politics, on the one hand, and cognition and communicability, on the other, and then to reduce the aesthetic dimensions to moments that rupture the dominant order of sense. I examine Black Lives Matter activism to argue against this tendency. Black Lives Matter activism introduces new perceptions into the field of sensory experience, but these new perceptions arrive in cognitive and communicative form. Moreover, the activists' performances insert these new perceptions into the world of their opponents, transforming the dominant sensory world from within. Political-aesthetic transformations occur not when heterogeneous elements interrupt the dominant order of sense but when actors invoke a counterworld that is imbricated in the sensory world it opposes.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2016-11-21
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.49.4.0459
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (24)

  1. Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.
  2. Apel, Dora. 2014. “Hands Up, Don't Shoot: Surrendering Liberal Illusions.” Theory and Event 17 (3): supp.
  3. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Chambers, Samuel. 2013. The Lessons of Rancière. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Chasmar, Jessica. 2015. “Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke: Black Lives Matter ‘Will Join Forces’ with Islamic S…
Show all 24 →
  1. Cohen, Robert. 2014. “Police Fire Tear Gas and Protester Throws It Back.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 13 Aug. ww…
  2. Drake, Bruce. 2014. “Ferguson Highlights Deep Divisions Between Blacks and Whites in America.” Pew Research C…
  3. Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. “Hermeneutic and Analytic Philosophy: Two Complementary Versions of the Linguistic Tu…
  4. Kompridis, Nikolas, ed. 2014. The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought. New York: Bloomsbury.
  5. Mackin, Glenn. 2013. The Politics of Social Welfare in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Miller, Gregg. 2011. Mimesis and Reason: Habermas's Political Philosophy. Albany: State University of New Yor…
  7. Mills, Charles. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  8. Mills, Charles. 2007. “White Ignorance.” In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, ed. Shannon Sullivan and Na…
  9. Nichanian, Daniel. 2012. “Contesting Claims to Mastery: Responsiveness and Jacques Rancière's Politics of the…
  10. Panagia, Davide. 2006. The Poetics of Political Thinking. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  11. Panagia, Davide. 2009. The Political Life of Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  12. Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Trans. Kristin…
  13. Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Trans. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of…
  14. Rancière, Jacques. 2011. “The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics.” In Reading Rancière: A Critica…
  15. Rancière, Jacques. 2014. “The Aesthetic Dimension: Aesthetics, Politics, Knowledge.” In The Aesthetic Turn in…
  16. Reynolds, Barbara. 2015. “I Was a Civil Rights Activist in the 1960s. But It's Hard for Me to Get Behind Blac…
  17. Smith, Michelle. 2014. “Affect and Respectability.” Theory and Event, 17 (3): supp.
  18. State of Missouri v. Darren Wilson. 2014. Transcript of Grand Jury, vol. 5. www.documentcloud.org/documents/1…
  19. Zerilli, Linda. 2005. “We Feel Our Freedom: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.” Politi…