Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, I argue that Althusser's theory of interpellation suggests, however obliquely, a way to subvert and ruin the formation of subjectivity under liberal capitalism. For Althusser, when the law calls the subject, “nine times out of ten” the person called is “really” the one that the law intended. This article asks about the one in ten who is not the one whom the law wanted but who answers the call anyway. This is what I am calling the misinterpellated subject. I argue that this subject, because she or he is unwanted and unexpected, rhetorically ruins the scene of interpellation, offering a potentially radical source of resistance to liberal capitalism. Looking at Althusser's work on interpellation along with critics like Judith Butler and Lauren Berlant, I seek to show how the occasional flaws in interpellation (the one in ten) can be expanded by developing an anarchist politics as well as anarchist forms of subjectivity.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2015-11-23
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.48.4.0494
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  2. Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  3. Ferguson, Michaele. 2012. Sharing Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Kohn, Margaret, and Keally McBride. 2011. Political Theories of Decolonization: Postcolonialism and the Probl…
  5. Martel, James. 2014. The One and Only Law: Walter Benjamin and the Second Commandment. Ann Arbor: University …
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →