I Will Regret Later

Sergey Dolgopolski Buffalo State University

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores the rhetoric of regret as a way to rethink the aesthetic dimension of two hitherto artificially separated late ancient corpora of thought—rabbinic and “pagan.” Moving away from the thinking in terms of historicist “influences” I arrive at a point of mutual illumination of the corpora, thereby advancing a new model of philosophical and rhetorical analysis that both justifies the importance of the modern discussion of relationships between philosophy, rhetoric, and aesthetics for understanding the Talmud as a late ancient body of text and thought and shows how the Talmud, thus understood, complicates and raises the stakes in that discussion. I first draw on the framework of this bidirectional analysis for probing the rhetoric of the rabbis and of the “pagan” philosophers. I consequently work against the grain of a modern interpretation of late ancient aesthetics to arrive to a comparative study of the aesthetics of rabbinic discourse.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2015-02-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0073
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Hidary, Richard. 2010. “Classical Rhetorical Arrangement and reasoning in the Talmud: The Case of Yerushalmi …
  2. Jaffee, Martin S. 2001. Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian Judaism, 200 BCE–400 CE…
  3. Poulakos, John. 2007. “From the Depth of Rhetoric: The Emergence of the Aesthetics as a Discipline” Philosoph…
  4. Rubenstein, Jeffrey L. 2003. The Culture of the Babylonian Talmud. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →