Arguing for the Immortality of the Soul in the Palinode of thePhaedrus

Christopher Moore Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article argues that in his second speech of the Phaedrus (the “palinode”), Socrates gives an intentionally fallacious argument. He gives this argument, starting “all/every soul is immortal” (245c6–246a2), to show his speech-loving friend Phaedrus how—rather than simply to tell him that—analytic as much as imagistic speech can persuade without deserving conviction. This argument joins four others that recent Phaedrus scholarship has shown to be deliberately misconstructed. The entire dialogue has Socrates demonstrating to Phaedrus that the proper attitude to speech is active and critical scrutiny. “Philosophy”—toward which Socrates wants to turn Phaedrus—is not the rhetorical mode “speaking in sequential inferences” but is instead a kind of shared listening and conversation, an association committed to “making a person most thoughtful.” Yet inducting someone into philosophy still depends on some rhetorical mode: the kind that reveals a person's need for a commitment to investigation.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2014-05-22
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.47.2.0179
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (44)

  1. Ackrill, J. L. 1953. “Review of R. Hackforth, Plato's Phaedrus.”Mind 62: 277–277.
  2. Arieti, James A. 1986. “A Dramatic Interpretation of Plato's Phaedo.”Illinois Classical Studies 11 (1–2): 129–129.
  3. Asmis, Elizabeth. 1986. “Psychagogia in Plato's Phaedrus.”Illinois Studies in Classical Philology 11 (1–2): 1…
  4. Bardsley, Beverly Jean. 1975. “The Soul as Self-Moving Motion: The Synthesis of Madness and Sobriety in Plato…
  5. Belfiore, Elizabeth S. 2012. Socrates' Daimonic Art: Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues. Cambridge: C…
Show all 44 →
  1. Bett, Richard. 1986. “Immortality and the Nature of the Soul in the Phaedrus.”Phronesis 311: 1–1.
  2. Blyth, Dougal. 1997. “The Ever-Moving Soul in Plato's Phaedrus.”American Journal of Philology 1182: 185–185.
  3. Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda. 1970. “Aeikinêton o Autokinêton.”Acme 23: 91–91.
  4. Demos, Raphael. 1968. “Plato's Doctrine of the Psyche as a Self-moving Motion.”Journal of the History of Phil…
  5. De Vries, Gerrit J. 1969. A Commentary on the “Phaedrus” of Plato. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.
  6. Diano, Carlo. 1947. “Quod semper movetur aeternum est.”La parola del passato 2: 189–189.
  7. Ferrari, Giovanni. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's “Phaedrus.”Cambridge: Cambridge Univers…
  8. Fossheim, Hallvard J. 2010. “Non-individuality in the Phaedrus.”Symbolae Osloenses 841: 49–49.
  9. Frutiger, Perceval. 1930. Les mythes de Platon. Paris: Alcan.
  10. Gill, Mary Louise, and James G. Lennox, eds. 1994. Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Prin…
  11. Griswold, Charles. 1986. Self-Knowledge in Plato's “Phaedrus.”New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  12. Hackforth, Reginald. 1952. Plato's “Phaedrus.”Cambridge University Press.
  13. Hankinson, R. James. 1990. “Implications of Immortality.”Boston Area Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy 6: 1–1.
  14. Ju, Anna E. 2009. “Stoic and Posidonian Thought on the Immortality of the Soul.”Classical Quarterly 591: 112–112.
  15. Klosko, George. 1987. “Plato and the Morality of Fallacy.”American Journal of Philology 1084: 612–612.
  16. Martin, Rex. 1990. “Treatment and Rehabilitation as a Mode of Punishment.”Philosophical Topics 181: 101–101.
  17. Mason, Andrew. 1998. “Plato on the Self-Moving Soul.”Philosophical Inquiry 20 (1–1): 18–18.
  18. McPherran, Mark L. 1994. “Socrates on the Immortality of the Soul.”Journal of the History of Philosophy 321: 1–1.
  19. Moore, Christopher. 2013. “Deception and Knowledge in the Phaedrus.”Ancient Philosophy 331: 97–97.
  20. Moore, Christopher. “Socrates Psychagogos.” Forthcoming. In Socratica 3, ed. Livio Rossetti, Alessandro Stavr…
  21. Moss, Jessica. 2013. “Soul-Leading: The Unity of the Phaedrus, Again.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosoph…
  22. Nicholson, Graeme. 1999. Plato's “Phaedrus”: The Philosophy of Love. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
  23. Patterson, Robert Leet. 1965. Plato on Immortality. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  24. Peterson, Sandra. 2011. Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Pieper, Josef. 1964. Enthusiasm and Divine Madness. Trans. Richard Winston and Clara Winston. New York: Harco…
  26. Reed, N. H. 1974. “Plato, Phaedrus 245d–e.”Classical Review 241: 5–5.
  27. Robinson, Thomas M. 1968. “The Nature and Significance of the Argument for Immortality in the Phaedrus.”Apeir…
  28. Rowe, Christopher. 1986. Plato: “Phaedrus.”Warminster, UK: Aris and Phillips.
  29. Ryan, Paul. 2012. Plato's “Phaedrus”: A Commentary for Greek Readers. Tulsa: University of Oklahoma Press.
  30. Sallis, John. 1975. Being and Logos: The Way of Platonic Dialogue. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  31. Scott, Dominic. 2011. “Philosophy and Madness in the Phaedrus.”Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Brad…
  32. Scully, Stephen, ed. 2003. Plato's “Phaedrus.”Newburyport MA: Focus.
  33. Sharples, R. W. 1985. “Plato's Phaedrus: Argument for Immortality and Cicero's Somnium Scipionis.”Liverpool C…
  34. Skemp, J. B. 1942. The Theory of Motion in Plato's Later Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Sprague, Ralph K. 1962. Plato's Use of Fallacy: A Study of the “Euthydemus” and Some Other Dialogues. London:…
  36. Vlastos, Gregory. 1939. “The Disorderly Motion in the Timaios.”Classical Quarterly 332: 71–71.
  37. Werner, Daniel S. 2012. Myth and Philosophy in Plato's “Phaedrus.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Yunis, Harvey. 2011. Plato: “Phaedrus.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Zaslavsky, Robert. 1981. Platonic Myth and Platonic Writing. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.