Abstract

AbstractWhat does it mean to say rhetoric scholarship should be relevant to democratic practice? A prevailing answer to this question insists that rhetoric scholars are participants in the democratic contest for power just like all other citizens, no more and no less. Drawing on the work of Slavoj Žižek, the argument of this essay is that reducing scholarship to a mode of political agency not only produces an increasingly uninhabitable academic identity but also draws our attention away from producing results of rhetorical inquiry designed to be useful to citizens in democracy. Clinging to the idea that academic practice is a mode of political action produces a fantastic blindness to the antagonism between scholarly reflection and political agency that structures academic purpose. While empirical barriers to the production of rhetorical resources suitable for democratic appropriation undoubtedly exist, ignoring the self-frustrating character of academic desire is no less of an impediment to the production of democratically consequential rhetoric scholarship.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-03-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.1.0001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (40)

  1. Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: Universi…
  2. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Burke, Kenneth. 1984a. Attitudes Toward History. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Burke, Kenneth. 1984b. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of Californ…
  5. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1972. “Conventional Wisdom/Traditional Form: A Rejoinder.” Quarterly Journal of Speec…
Show all 40 →
  1. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1983. “Response to Forbes Hill.” Central States Speech Journal 34 (2): 126–27.
  2. Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven F. Rendall. Berkeley: University of Ca…
  3. Condit, Celeste M. 1990. “Rhetorical Criticism and Audiences: The Extremes of Mcgee and Leff.” Western Journa…
  4. Crick, Nathan. 2006. “Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Public Intellectual.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 39 (2): 127–39.
  5. Eagleton, Terry. 1990. The Significance of Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  6. Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and…
  7. Fish, Stanley. 2008. Save the World on Your Own Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Fuller, Steve. 2006. “The Public Intellectual as Agent of Justice: In Search of a Regime.” Philosophy and Rhe…
  9. Giroux, Henry A. 2004. “Cultural Studies, Public Pedagogy, and the Responsibility of Intellectuals.” Communic…
  10. Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Trans. Jeremy J. S…
  11. Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Theory and Practice. Trans. John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press.
  12. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Tr…
  13. Hartnett, Stephen J. 2010. “Communication, Social Justice, and Joyful Commitment.” Western Journal of Communi…
  14. Ivie, Robert L. 1994. “The Performance of Rhetorical Knowledge.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 (2): 2.
  15. Ivie, Robert L. 2005. “A Presumption of Academic Freedom.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studie…
  16. Klumpp, James F., and Thomas A. Hollihan. 1989. “Rhetorical Criticism as Moral Action.” Quarterly Journal of …
  17. McGee, Michael Calvin. 1982. “A Materialist Conception of Rhetoric.” In Explorations in Rhetoric: Studies in …
  18. McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. “Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture.” Western Journal …
  19. McKerrow, Raymie E. 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.” Communication Monographs 56 (2): 91–111.
  20. Michael, John. 2000. Anxious Intellects: Academic Professionals, Public Intellectuals, and Enlightenment Valu…
  21. Mills, C. Wright. 2000. The Sociological Imagination. 40th anniversary ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Motter, Jeff. 2010. “American Exceptionalism and the Rhetoric of Humanitarian Militarism: The Case of the 200…
  23. Murphy, John M. 1995. “Critical Rhetoric as Political Discourse.” Argumentation and Advocacy 32 (1):1–15.
  24. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1989. Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. Trans. Sander L. Gilman, Ca…
  25. Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 1992. “Commitment to Telos: A Sustained Critical Rhetoric.” Communication Mo…
  26. Roberts-Miller, Patricia. 1999. Voices in the Wilderness: Public Discourse and the Paradox of Puritan Rhetori…
  27. Simonson, Peter. 2010. “The Streets of Laredo: Mercurian Rhetoric and the Obama Campaign.” Western Journal of…
  28. Wander, Philip. 1983. “The Ideological Turn in Modern Criticism.” Communication Studies 34 (1): 1–18.
  29. Wander, Philip. 1990. “Critical and Classical Theory: An Introduction to Ideology Criticism.” In Cold War Rhe…
  30. Young, Anna M., Adria Battaglia, and Dana L. Cloud. 2010. “(Un) Disciplining the Scholar Activist: Policing t…
  31. Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
  32. Žižek, Slavoj. 1991. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  33. Žižek, Slavoj. 1994. Mapping Ideology. London: Verso.
  34. Žižek, Slavoj. 2005. Interrogating the Real: Selected Writings. Ed. Rex Butler and Scott Stephens. London: Co…
  35. Žižek, Slavoj. 2008. Enjoy Your Symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New York: Routledge.