Abstract

AbstractWhat does it mean to say rhetoric scholarship should be relevant to democratic practice? A prevailing answer to this question insists that rhetoric scholars are participants in the democratic contest for power just like all other citizens, no more and no less. Drawing on the work of Slavoj Žižek, the argument of this essay is that reducing scholarship to a mode of political agency not only produces an increasingly uninhabitable academic identity but also draws our attention away from producing results of rhetorical inquiry designed to be useful to citizens in democracy. Clinging to the idea that academic practice is a mode of political action produces a fantastic blindness to the antagonism between scholarly reflection and political agency that structures academic purpose. While empirical barriers to the production of rhetorical resources suitable for democratic appropriation undoubtedly exist, ignoring the self-frustrating character of academic desire is no less of an impediment to the production of democratically consequential rhetoric scholarship.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-03-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.1.0001
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: Universi…
  2. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1972. “Conventional Wisdom/Traditional Form: A Rejoinder.” Quarterly Journal of Speec…
  4. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1983. “Response to Forbes Hill.” Central States Speech Journal 34 (2): 126–27.
  5. Condit, Celeste M. 1990. “Rhetorical Criticism and Audiences: The Extremes of Mcgee and Leff.” Western Journa…
  6. Crick, Nathan. 2006. “Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Public Intellectual.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 39 (2): 127–39.
  7. Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and…
  8. Fish, Stanley. 2008. Save the World on Your Own Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Fuller, Steve. 2006. “The Public Intellectual as Agent of Justice: In Search of a Regime.” Philosophy and Rhe…
  10. Giroux, Henry A. 2004. “Cultural Studies, Public Pedagogy, and the Responsibility of Intellectuals.” Communic…
  11. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Tr…
  12. Hartnett, Stephen J. 2010. “Communication, Social Justice, and Joyful Commitment.” Western Journal of Communi…
  13. Ivie, Robert L. 1994. “The Performance of Rhetorical Knowledge.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 (2): 2.
  14. Ivie, Robert L. 2005. “A Presumption of Academic Freedom.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studie…
  15. Klumpp, James F., and Thomas A. Hollihan. 1989. “Rhetorical Criticism as Moral Action.” Quarterly Journal of …
  16. McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. “Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture.” Western Journal …
  17. McKerrow, Raymie E. 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.” Communication Monographs 56 (2): 91–111.
  18. Michael, John. 2000. Anxious Intellects: Academic Professionals, Public Intellectuals, and Enlightenment Valu…
  19. Motter, Jeff. 2010. “American Exceptionalism and the Rhetoric of Humanitarian Militarism: The Case of the 200…
  20. Murphy, John M. 1995. “Critical Rhetoric as Political Discourse.” Argumentation and Advocacy 32 (1):1–15.
  21. Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 1992. “Commitment to Telos: A Sustained Critical Rhetoric.” Communication Mo…
  22. Simonson, Peter. 2010. “The Streets of Laredo: Mercurian Rhetoric and the Obama Campaign.” Western Journal of…
  23. Wander, Philip. 1983. “The Ideological Turn in Modern Criticism.” Communication Studies 34 (1): 1–18.
  24. Young, Anna M., Adria Battaglia, and Dana L. Cloud. 2010. “(Un) Disciplining the Scholar Activist: Policing t…
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →