Each Thing a Thief:

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn this article Julia Ng addresses the question of material agency. Drawing on an idea that emerges from Marx’s reading of Shakespeare’s Timon to the effect that humanity’s relationship to objects is characterized by “cannibalism,” a usurious relationship based on exploitation and thievery, Ng argues that Benjamin’s unique mixing of materialism and the theological serves as an answer to the dilemma of cannibalism and human nature. Looking in particular at Benjamin’s 1931 essay on Karl Kraus—which also discusses Timon—Ng shows that for Benjamin, there is a redemption for this cannibalism, one that is found through recourse to the idea of letting “justice befall the object as such” and, by extension, through the development of a positive determination of life as such as well.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2011-12-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.44.4.0382
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bennett, Jane . 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  2. Fenves, Peter . 2003. Late Kant: Towards Another Law of the Earth. New York: Routledge.
  3. Hamacher, Werner . 2002. “Guilt History: Benjamin's Sketch ‘Capitalism as Religion.’ ”diacritics32 ( 3–4): 81–106.
  4. Shakespeare, William . 2001. Timon of Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Shell, Susan . 1997. “Cannibals All: The Grave Wit of Kant's Perpetual Peace.” In Violence, Identity, and Sel…
  6. Weber, Samuel . 2008. Benjamin's–abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →