Meeting Opposites:

Marc de Wilde University of Amsterdam

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article analyzes the critical dialogue between Walter Benjamin and Carl Schmitt, to which a letter and several references in their work testify. It shows how affinities and differences between their respective positions can be explained from a shared theologico-political approach. Both authors believe that, in spite of secularization, political phenomena can only be adequately understood in light of certain theological concepts, images, and metaphors. However, they explain these theologico-political analogies differently. Whereas Schmitt advocates the authoritarian state, which he compares to God’s omnipotence, Benjamin endorses the proletarian revolution, in which he recognizes traces of a divine law-destroying violence. Challenging existing interpretations, this article shows how the political theologies of Benjamin and Schmitt are not static but developed in the course of their dialogue, in which both authors respond to each other’s criticism by changing and correcting their own positions in significant ways.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2011-12-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.44.4.0363
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. Agamben, Giorgio . 2005. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bolz, Norbert . 1989. Auszug aus der entzauberten Welt. Munich: Fink.
  3. Bredekamp, Horst . 1999. “From Walter Benjamin to Carl Schmitt, via Thomas Hobbes.”Critical Inquiry25 (2): 247–66.
  4. Eichhorn, Mathias . 1994. Es wird regiert! Der Staat im Denken Karl Barths und Carl Schmitts in den Jahren 19…
  5. Grossheutschi, Felix . 1996. Carl Schmitt und die Lehre vom Katechon. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
  6. Heil, Suzanne . 1996. Gefährliche Beziehungen: Walter Benjamin und Carl Schmitt. Stuttgart Weimar: Metzler.
  7. Jay, Martin . 1987. “Reconciling the Irreconcilable? Rejoinder to Kennedy.”Telos71: 67–80.
  8. Kambas, Chryssoula . 1982. “Walter Benjamin an Gottfried Salomon: Bericht uber eine unveröffentlichte Korresp…
  9. Kennedy, Ellen . 1987. “Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School.”Telos71: 37–66.
  10. Kennedy, Ellen . 2004. Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  11. Meier, Heinrich . 1995. Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Metzger, Paul . 2005. Katechon: II Thess. 2:1-12 im Horizont apokalyptischen Denkens. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  13. Meuter, Günter . 1994. Der Katechon: Zu Carl Schmitts fundamentalistischer Kritik der Zeit. Berlin: Duncker u…
  14. Preuss, Ulrich . 1987. “The Critique of German Liberalism: Reply to Kennedy.”Telos71: 97–109.
  15. Schmitt, Carl . 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. …
  16. Söllner, Alfons . 1987. “Beyond Carl Schmitt: Political Theory in the Frankfurt School.”Telos71: 81–96.
  17. Weber, Samuel . 1992. “Taking Exception to Decision: Walter Benjamin and Carl Schmitt,”Diacritics22 (3–4): 518.
  18. Wilde, Marc de . 2006. “Violence in the State of Exception: Reflections on Theologico-Political Motifs in Ben…
  19. Wilde, Marc de . 2009. “Benjamin's Politics of Remembrance: A Reading of ‘Über den Begriff der Geschichte.’ ”…
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →