Ways of Being Reasonable:

Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor

Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Ways of Being Reasonable:Perelman and the Philosophers Christopher W. Tindale Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 337–361. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Christopher W. Tindale; Ways of Being Reasonable:Perelman and the Philosophers. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 337–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Advances in the History of Rhetoric

References (42) · 1 in this index

  1. Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed. Trans. George A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford U…
  2. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1970. Aspects of Language: Essays and Lectures on Philosophy of Language, Linguistic Ph…
  3. Bubner, Rüdiger, ed. 1970. Hermeneutik und Dialektik: Aufsatze. Tübingen: Mohr.
  4. Cahiers de Royaumont. 1962. La philosophie analytique. Paris: Minuit.
  5. Chapman, Siobhan. 2005. Paul Grice: Philosopher and Linguist. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Show all 42 →
  1. Conley, Thomas M. 1990. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Freeman, James. 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cam…
  3. Frege, Gottlob. 1950. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number…
  4. Frege, Gottlob. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  5. Gonseth, Frederic. 1947. “L'idée de dialectique aux entretiens de Zurich.” Dialectica 1:1–36.
  6. Goodwin, Jean. 1995. “Perelman, Adhering, and Conviction.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (3): 215–33.
  7. Grice, Paul. 1986. “Reply to Richards.” In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, ed. Richard E. Grandy and Ri…
  8. Grice, Paul. 1989. “Postwar Oxford Philosophy.” Studies in the Way of Words, 171–80. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U…
  9. Gross, Alan, and Ray D. Dearin. 2003. Chaim Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  10. Hanfling, Oswald. 2000. Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. London: Routledge.
  11. Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  12. Hart, H. L. A. 1963. Introduction to Chaïm Perelman, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. Trans. …
  13. Hume, David. 1955. “My Own Life.” An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. C. W. Hendel. Indianapolis, …
  14. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1959. Philosophy and Argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  15. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1965. “Persuasion and Validity in Philosophy.” In Philosophy, Rhetoric and Argumenta…
  16. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1978. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument. University Park: Dialogue Pre…
  17. Mackie, J. L. 1967. “Fallacies.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards, 3: 169–79. New York: Ma…
  18. Mackie, J. L. 1974. Review of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, ed., Pragmatics of Natural Languages. British Journal of t…
  19. Maneli, Mieczyslaw. 1994. Perelman's New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century. Dordrec…
  20. McKerrow, Ray E. 1977. “Rhetorical Validity: An Analysis of Three Perspectives on the Justification of Rhetor…
  21. Perelman, Chaïm. 1963. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. Trans. John Petrie. London: Routledge…
  22. Perelman, Chaïm. 1971. “The New Rhetoric.” In Pragmatics of Natural Languages, ed. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, 145–4…
  23. Perelman, Chaïm. 1979. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  24. Perelman, Chaïm. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dam…
  25. Perelman, Chaïm. 1989. “The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments.” In The New Rhetori…
  26. Perelman, Chaïm. 2003 [1949]. “First Philosophies and Regressive Philosophy.” Trans. David A. Frank and Miche…
  27. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John…
  28. Rescher, Nicolas. 1966. “Recent Developments and Trends in Logic.” Logique et analyse 9:269–79.
  29. Ricoeur, Paul. 2000. The Just. Trans. David Pellauer. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  30. Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1972. “Argumentation and Philosophical Clarification.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (1): 12–23.
  31. Scult, Allen. 1976. “Perelman's Universal Audience: One Perspective.” Central States Speech Journal 27 (3): 1…
  32. Strawson, Peter. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.
  33. Strawson, Peter. 1959. Review of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, Traité de l'argumentation. Mind 6…
  34. Strawson, Peter. 1974. Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar. London: Methuen.
  35. Taylor, Charles. 1964. Review of Cahiers de Royaumont, La philosophie analytique. Philosophical Review 73 (1)…
  36. Tindale, Christopher W. 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  37. Argumentation